The Power of Heat: 16x More Energy at 550°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter lilkrazyrae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Heat Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy emitted from a black body at 550°C compared to 22°C, emphasizing the importance of using Kelvin for accurate results. The relationship between temperature and energy output follows the Stefan-Boltzmann law, where energy is proportional to the fourth power of temperature. Participants clarify that doubling the temperature increases energy emission by a factor of 16, but caution against using Celsius directly in calculations. They highlight the need to convert Celsius to Kelvin for proper analysis. The conversation underscores the significance of consistent units and surface area in energy output comparisons.
lilkrazyrae
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
How many times more energy is emitted from a black body at 550. degrees C than at a room temperature of 22.0 degrees C.
So I know that a double in temperature increases energy by 2^4=16 so would I just do 25^4=390625 for this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well assuming the radiant heat flux is given by Q is proportional to T4, then Q1/Q2 = (T1/T2)4.
 
lilkrazyrae said:
How many times more energy is emitted from a black body at 550. degrees C than at a room temperature of 22.0 degrees C.
So I know that a double in temperature increases energy by 2^4=16 so would I just do 25^4=390625 for this problem?

Careful with your units. Whenever you plug a temperature into the blackbody formula (or pretty much any other physics-related formula), you'll want to make sure the temperature is in kelvin. This is an important distinction because the zero-point of the celsius scale is defined to be the freezing point of water (roughly), not absolute zero. Once you convert to these units, you should find a much more reasonable value for the ratio of energy outputs. Do you know how to convert to kelvin?

By the way, the rate of energy output also depends on the surface area. Does the problem specify that the surface areas of the two objects are the same?
 
Ok that makes more sense! And the problem reads just as I wrote it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top