The radius of an ellipse from the origin.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the radius of an ellipse from its equation using polar coordinates. The user seeks assistance in transforming the denominator of the radius expression into a specific form involving the eccentricity of the ellipse. The eccentricity, denoted as e, is defined as e^2 = 1 - (b^2/a^2). Participants suggest using the identity cos^2(phi) + sin^2(phi) = 1 to aid in the transformation. The conversation also touches on the appropriate categorization of the post, suggesting it belongs in "Precalculus Mathematics."
Erez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
given (x^2)/(a^2) + (y^2)/(b^2) = 1.
and using polar coordinates x=rcos(phi) , y=rsin(phi),
equating gives r^2 = 1/[(cos^2(phi)/a^2) + (sin^2(phi)/b^2)].
or if we leave b in the nominator :
r= b/[(sin^2(phi)+(b^2/a^2)cos^2(phi)]^1/2.

-could someone give a hint as to how the demoninator of the last expression can be turned into [1 - (e^2)cos^2(phi)]^1/2 where e is the eccentricity of the ellipse?
and what is the value of e?


thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and what is the value of e

e^2=1-\frac{b^2}{a^2}

And by the way this is introductory physics section.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Erez! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Hint: use cos^2(phi) + sin^(phi) = 1.

Then … ? :smile:
 
Hello,
I am surprised I recived a reply so quick,
thank you.
p.s. in what category/section would this post belong ?
 
Erez said:
Hello,
I am surprised I recived a reply so quick,
thank you.
p.s. in what category/section would this post belong ?

Hi Erez :smile:

Well, it was a short question, clearly stated, without loads of irrelevant gumph to read through … and some of us give questions like that priority! :wink:

Well, this is just geometry, so it should really have gone into "Precalculus Mathematics", which is defined as "All math courses prior to calculus" :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top