B The Red Light Shift and Space Debris

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the redshift phenomenon, which is a key indicator of the universe's expansion. Participants clarify that redshift is a frequency shift of light, not a speed change, and that light consistently travels at the speed of light (c). The presence of atoms and dust in space does not significantly affect redshift, as any dispersion caused by such matter is negligible and unmeasurable. Furthermore, the conservation of spectral lines during redshift contrasts with the scattering effects of dust, which distort these lines. Overall, current evidence supports that redshift is not influenced by interstellar matter.
wlc88
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi,

As I understand it the theory that the universe is expanding is in part based off the red light shift. My question is could atoms in space, dust etc cause the red light to travel faster. I realize that space isn’t a medium, but could the aforementioned atoms and dust exist in such measurement per cubic meter to cause this?

Many thanks
 
  • Like
Likes TEFLing
Space news on Phys.org
wlc88 said:
Hi,

As I understand it the theory that the universe is expanding is in part based off the red light shift. My question is could atoms in space, dust etc cause the red light to travel faster. I realize that space isn’t a medium, but could the aforementioned atoms and dust exist in such measurement per cubic meter to cause this?

Many thanks
That wouldn't create redshift. It would create dispersion. It can be tested by, for instance, observing far-away objects which have time-dependent properties. Far-away quasars are really good examples, because they tend to vary quite a bit in brightness. If different wavelengths of light traveled at different speeds, then you'd see the brightness changes happening at different times for different colors.

Measurements so far indicate that there is no significant dispersion yet detected.
 
  • Like
Likes TEFLing and PeroK
wlc88 said:
Hi,

As I understand it the theory that the universe is expanding is in part based off the red light shift. My question is could atoms in space, dust etc cause the red light to travel faster. I realize that space isn’t a medium, but could the aforementioned atoms and dust exist in such measurement per cubic meter to cause this?

Many thanks
Sorry, but that doesn't even make sense. Light does not travel faster or slower, it travels at c. Period. Red shift is a FREQUENCY shift, not a speed shift.
 
phinds said:
Sorry, but that doesn't even make sense. Light does not travel faster or slower, it travels at c. Period. Red shift is a FREQUENCY shift, not a speed shift.
That's not strictly true, as light does travel at a slower speed when it travels through a medium. And it's also true that intergalactic space isn't strictly a vacuum. There's not much matter there, but there is some. So dispersion isn't completely absurd. But it definitely has nothing to do with redshift.

Current evidence is that the amount of dispersion is so small that it is basically unmeasurable. Incidentally, there are some proposed theories which predict some dispersion for extremely high-energy photons. But so far there hasn't been any evidence of that either.
 
  • Like
Likes TEFLing
kimbyd said:
... light does travel at a slower speed when it travels through a medium.

Current evidence is that the amount of dispersion is so small that it is basically unmeasurable
I was treating space as a vacuum and I think you just made my point.
 
wlc88 said:
Hi,

As I understand it the theory that the universe is expanding is in part based off the red light shift. My question is could atoms in space, dust etc cause the red light to travel faster. I realize that space isn’t a medium, but could the aforementioned atoms and dust exist in such measurement per cubic meter to cause this?

Many thanks

No. One of the unique properties of redshit is that it conserves spectral lines. That is, the pattern of emission and absorption lines created when light is emitted by or passes through a gas are scaled by the same factor as the redshift, but they still exist. Absorption and scattering by dust erases spectral lines, while absorption by single atoms and simple molecules merely adds more spectral lines, it does not scale the original lines.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, TEFLing and phinds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top