The relationship between pH and pOH at 70 ◦C/ 343.15 K

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between pH and pOH for pure water at 70 °C is determined using the Van't Hoff equation, which accounts for temperature changes affecting the ion product of water. Initially, the attempt yielded a pH of 5.5, but this was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of logarithmic calculations. After clarification, the correct calculation showed that at 70 °C, pH + pOH equals 12.7, resulting in a pH of 6.35. This demonstrates that as temperature increases, the pH of pure water decreases, aligning with Le Châtelier's principle. The final values confirm the expected decrease in pH with rising temperature.
ChristinaMaria
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The relationship between pH and pOH, for pure water, at 25 ◦C is
14 = pH + pOH

What is the corresponding relationship between pH and pOH, for pure water, at 70 ◦C?

Homework Equations


Le Châtelier's principle?
[H+][OH-] = 10-14
[10-7][10-7] = 10-14 (25 ◦C)
[10-n][10-m] = 10-b (70 ◦C)

ΔG◦ = ΔH◦ - TΔS◦ (?)
ΔG = ΔG◦ + RTln(Q) (?)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to use the formula ΔG = ΔG◦ + RTln(Q) for water at 25 ◦C to find the thermodynamic constant Q.
Result:
(at 25 degrees ) ΔG = -48.8 kJ/mol
I then tried to change the equation of ΔG to give Q:
Q = 10ΔG / ΔG◦ + RT

but I realized that I can't do this, as ΔG◦ is dependent on the temperature of the system.

I know that pH decreases at temperature increases due to Le Châtelier's principle. But I don't understand how I can use this to find a corresponding relationship to pH + pOH = ?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asked to estimate Kw of water from known thermodynamic data (van 't Hoff's equation comes to mind), or do you just need the value (it is tabulated and not that difficult to find)?
 
  • Like
Likes ChristinaMaria
We are probably supposed to use van'T Hoff's equation! I will try that. Thank you! :smile:
 
Borek said:
Are you asked to estimate Kw of water from known thermodynamic data (van 't Hoff's equation comes to mind), or do you just need the value (it is tabulated and not that difficult to find)?

Hi again.
I thought I would give an update with my attempt to solve the problem.

I followed your suggestion and used the Van't Hoff equation:
6b566ffa2e3352acf5082c91ae882471fe7f8de6

With the following values:
ΔH⊖ = 56000 J/mol, K1 = 10-14, R = 8.214 J/mol K, T2 = 343.15 K and T1 = 298.15 Kln K2/10-14 = 2.99
K2/10-14 = 102.99 = 977.24
K2 = 977.24 * 10-14 = 9.8 * 10-12

=> (70 C/ 343.14K) [H+][OH-] = 9.8 * 10-12
pH + pOH = -log( 9.8 * 10-12 )
[H+] = sqrt( 9.8 * 10-12 ) = 3.13 * 10-6
pH = -log[H+] = 5.5My results:
the relationship between pH and pOH at 70 degrees C is:
[H+][OH-] = 9.8 * 10-12
and the pH of pure water at 70 degrees C is:
pH = -log[H+] = 5.5Unfortunately my results are different from the numerical answers given to us with the exercises, where it says that the pH should be 6.35.
I'm not sure what I did that made it wrong, but I know now that we are supposed to use the Van't Hoff equation as it was confirmed on our class' discussion board.

Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
ChristinaMaria said:
Hi again.
ln K2/10-14 = 2.99
K2/10-14 = 102.99 = 977.24

What does "ln" mean?
 
  • Like
Likes ChristinaMaria
Borek said:
What does "ln" mean?
I meant "ln" as the natural logarithm to K2/10-14. I then raised 10 to the power of K2/10-14 to remove the "ln". Is this part wrong?
:smile:

Update:
I understand what you mean now, I was supposed to raise e to the power of K2/10-14, not 10 to K2/10-14 like you would do with "log"..!

I used e instead of 10 as the "base", and got the correct answers pH + pOH = 12.7 and pH = 6.35 at 70 degrees C for pure water.
Thank you so much for the help!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top