The Spaceship and The Wrench (1/2 + 1/2 = 4/5)

  • Thread starter Thread starter acheong87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship Wrench
acheong87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Background

This started out as a question, but answered itself in the process of being written up. I thought I'd post it anyway, in case it might help clarify something for someone else. It is an alternative derivation of the solution to a (similar) question asked in Six Not-So-Easy Pieces. Of course, Feynman's solution is far more elegant; this is merely how I came across the solution "in my own words."

Problem

  1. A spaceship is moving with velocity v_s as measured by an observer "at rest".
  2. A wrench within the spaceship is moving with velocity v_w' as measured by an observer within the spaceship.
  3. At what velocity is the wrench moving, as measured by the observer at rest?

Solution

We might summarize the problem as: Solve for v_w in terms of v_s and v_w'.

We begin with the equivalence,

$$v_w = \frac{x_w}{t_w}$$

where x_w is the displacement of the wrench after time t_w.

Note: I prefer to subscript all variables with their object counterparts, even if painfully obvious, in order to be perfectly clear as to whose perspective we speak of. In fact, my own attempts to solve this problem failed, initially, because I mistakenly swapped time, as experienced by the spaceship, with time, as experienced by the wrench, as if they were interchangeable.

We recall the reverse Lorentz transformation (i.e. the displacement of the wrench in the rest frame, in terms of its displacement in the moving frame):

$$x_w = \frac{x_w'+v_st_w'}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}}$$

And we note that

$$x_w' = v_w't_w'$$

Combining the above three equations and factoring out the t_w', we reach

$$v_w = \frac{t_w'}{t_w}\frac{v_w'+v_s}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}}$$

Finally, we seek to rid the time variables, and to do so, we recall the Lorentz transformations for time:

$$t_w' = \frac{t_w-v_sx_w/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}}\hspace{1in}t_w = \frac{t_w'+v_sx_w'/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}}$$

Which shall we substitute? t_w' or t_w? It turns out that substituting the latter is much more productive (as substituting the former simply undos our work thus far).

\begin{align}
v_w &= \frac{t_w'}{\frac{t_w'+v_sx_w'/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}}}\frac{v_w'+v_s}{\sqrt{1-v_s^2/c^2}} \\
v_w &= \frac{t_w'(v_w'+v_s)}{t_w'+v_sx_w'/c^2} \\
v_w &= \frac{v_w'+v_s}{1+v_s\frac{x_w'}{t_w'}/c^2} \\
v_w &= \frac{v_w'+v_s}{1+v_sv_w'/c^2}
\end{align}

And there you have it.

If a spaceship were moving at \frac{1}{2}c, and a wrench within it at \frac{1}{2}c, then the wrench, to an outside observer, moves at \frac{4}{5}c.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you know what you're doing. So I won't check the details. Since the final answer is correct, I assume the derivation is too. I just want to say that I like to do this by considering the composition of two Lorentz transformations in matrix form. I think this is is the easiest way to do it.

In units such that c=1, the Lorentz transformation with velocity v is
$$\Lambda(v)=\gamma(v)\begin{pmatrix}1 & -v\\ -v & 1\end{pmatrix},$$ where
$$\gamma(v)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}.$$

Let u be the velocity of the ship relative to the external observer. Let v be the velocity of the wrench relative to the ship. We just need to find the velocity of the Lorentz transformation ##\Lambda(u)\Lambda(v)##, so we do the matrix multiplication. Well, half of it anyway. We're not going to need the second row, so I'll just put asterisks there, instead of writing out irrelevant matrix elements.
$$\Lambda(u)\Lambda(v) =\gamma(u)\gamma(v)\begin{pmatrix}1+uv & -u-v\\ * & *\end{pmatrix} =\gamma(u)\gamma(v)(1+uv) \begin{pmatrix}1 & -\frac{u+v}{1+uv}\\ * & *\end{pmatrix}.$$ Now we just need to compare this with the first formula I wrote down to see that the velocity is
$$\frac{u+v}{1+uv}.$$
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top