The Troposkien (skipping rope curve)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Siberion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Rope
Siberion
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
The Troposkien (skipping rope curve) - Variational principle approach

Homework Statement


Consider a chain of length l and homogeneous mass density ρ rotating with constant angular velocity ω with respect to an axis which bounds the two ends. There is no gravity acting on the system, and and d < l, where d is the separation between both ends of the chain.

a) Find a principle of least action that describes the system.
b) Find the equations of motion that describe the system,

So basically this is the image of the resulting curve for better understanding of the problem:
220px-Darrieus_rotor001.jpg


Homework Equations



I wanted to approach the problem with the same principle that applies to the catenary, (i.e chain hanging under its own weight) but replacing the gravity acceleration g in terms of the angular velocity ω.

For the catenary, we want to minimize the potential energy:

V = ∫gρy√(1+x&#039;^2) dy

In our case, the centrifugal acceleration will take the role of gravity, in which g = -yω^2

Replacing into the previous equation, and considering the condition that the length of the chain remains constant, i.e l = ∫ds (I will add the lagrange multiplier for such constrain), the action can be written as:

I = -ρω^2∫y^2√(1+x&#039;^2)dy + λ(∫√(1+x&#039;^2)dy - l)

The Attempt at a Solution



I basically would like to know if this approach is justified, and in case it's not, any help or ideas would be very appreciated.

Thanks for your time
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks good to me.

Although I don't think it matters much, someone might argue that the first integral in I should have a factor of 1/2 if you consider the potential energy as coming from the integral with respect to y of the centrifugal force ρω2y.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top