The Twin Paradox: Mike & Angela's Frame of Reference

delve
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I am confused about the twin paradox. Let's imagine Mike and Angela are twins. Mike stays on Earth, and Angela rockets off, away from Earth at close to the speed of light, with the intention of making a round trip back to Earth at the end of her voyage. My question is this: why wouldn't Angela see Mike's frame of reference as accelerating and decelerating, just as Mike sees Angela's frame of reference as accelerating and deceleration? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
delve said:
I am confused about the twin paradox. Let's imagine Mike and Angela are twins. Mike stays on Earth, and Angela rockets off, away from Earth at close to the speed of light, with the intention of making a round trip back to Earth at the end of her voyage. My question is this: why wouldn't Angela see Mike's frame of reference as accelerating and decelerating, just as Mike sees Angela's frame of reference as accelerating and deceleration? Thank you.

Angela feels the force of acceleration twice on her journey. She knows she is not in an inertial frame of reference. That is what breaks the symmetry of the scenario.
 
it is angela who is accelrating and hence is affected by it...angela's frame is not an inertial frame but an accelerated one...on the other hand...no force is acting on mike...so his frame is an inertial frame...so angela won't see mike's frame as accelerating or decelerating...becoz the force is acting on angela and not on mike...
 
delve said:
I am confused about the twin paradox. Let's imagine Mike and Angela are twins. Mike stays on Earth, and Angela rockets off, away from Earth at close to the speed of light, with the intention of making a round trip back to Earth at the end of her voyage. My question is this: why wouldn't Angela see Mike's frame of reference as accelerating and decelerating, just as Mike sees Angela's frame of reference as accelerating and deceleration? Thank you.

That is what they see if they use accelerated reference systems; and nature doesn't care. A change of velocity (as defined with respect to inertial reference systems) breaks the symmetry. That was already elaborated in the first paper on this topic, here (p.47, and on from p.50):
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Evolution_of_Space_and_Time
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
137
Views
10K
Back
Top