Is Light's Terminal Velocity 300,000 km/s?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the theory that light's constant speed of 300,000 km/s could be viewed as its terminal velocity, akin to how objects fall through the atmosphere. However, participants clarify that light cannot be accelerated and always travels at the same speed for all observers, as established by the special theory of relativity. Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism supports this, indicating that light must travel at this speed to exist. The idea that light could behave differently depending on its direction relative to Earth's surface is also dismissed. Overall, the consensus is that light's speed is a fundamental constant, not influenced by gravitational or atmospheric factors.
questionauthority
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a theory about light: could our observations of light always traveling at 300 000 km/s be explained as the terminal velocity of light? When an object falls through the atmosphere it will eventually stop accelerating because the pressure of the atmosphere equals the pull of gravity. What if light is being pulled to the speed of 300 000 km/s by the gravity of the Earth and a substance, perhaps the Cosmic Background Radiation, keeps it from accelerating past that?

Thoughts?

questionauthority
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. Is it "can light be accelerated?" Well, technically no. But it does gain momentum when falling into a gravity well, like the Earth's gravitational field. You see light always moves at the same speed to all observers.
 
Isn't the CBR... a form of light?
 
questionauthority said:
could our observations of light always traveling at 300 000 km/s be explained as the terminal velocity of light?
No. As others have pointed out, concepts of acceleration and light do not mix. Our observation that light always travels at a set rate has been explained by the special theory of relativity.

It is also important to note that the experiments showing light travels at a set rate were preceeded by Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism. According to Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism and the principle of relativity, light must always travel at c. I think it was Brian Greene who said, "No one has ever held a lump of light in their hands," clarifying the notion that light *must* travel at c to exist (this is explained by both Maxwell's theory and quantum mechanics and goes hand-in-hand with Einstein's special theory of relativity).
 
Last edited:
If you were right, then light would travel at different speeds perpendicular to the Earth's surface than parallel to it. And it doesn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top