MHB Therefore, the additional cost for extending the insurance by 1 day is $32.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 816318
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per
816318
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Triangle Construction pays Square Insurance 5980 dollars to insure a construction site for 92 days. To extend the insurance beyond the 92 days costs $97 per day. At the end of this period, if Triangle extends the insurance by 1 day, how much more does Triangle pay for that day than it paid per day during the first period of time?

Can someone show me how set up to get the answer 32?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've edited the title of your thread to indicate the nature of the question being asked.

To find the cost per day for the first 92 days, which we'll call$C_1$, we need to take the total cost and divide by the total number of days.:

$$C_1=\frac{5980\text{ dollars}}{92\text{ days}}=65\,\frac{\text{dollars}}{\text{day}}$$

Now, to find how much more that 1 additional day costs, we find the difference $D$ between the cost for that additional day and the average cost for the first 92 days:

$$D=\left(97-65\right)\,\frac{\text{dollars}}{\text{day}}=32\,\frac{\text{dollars}}{\text{day}}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top