Thermal Equilibrium of a system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final temperature of a mixture of water, aluminum, and copper in thermal equilibrium. The initial assumption is that the final temperature will be below 26°C, as the energy needed to heat the water is greater than what the copper can provide. The confusion arises from the setup of the energy equations, with participants debating the correct formulation. The book's equation, which states that the sum of energy changes equals zero, is clarified as being consistent with the principle that energy lost by one substance is gained by another. Ultimately, understanding that negative values indicate energy loss resolves the confusion about the energy balance in the system.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A combination of .25kg of H2O at 20C, .4kg of Al at 26C and .1kg of Cu at 100C is mixed in an insulated container and allowed to come to thermal equilibrium. Ignore any energy transfer to or from the container and determine the final T of the mixture.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



At first this seemed really simple to me I just figured out if the T would be below or above 26 to determine which parts will lose energy and which will gain.
So it turns out that Tf will be less than 26 because the energy required to heat up water to 26 is greater than the copper can supply.

Setting up the equation is where I get lost.

If the energy lost by the Al and Cu must equal the energy gained by the water then shouldn't the equation be:

Q(Cu)+Q(Al)=Q(H2O)

where Q= mCΔT

The book has it set up as

Q(Cu)+Q(Al)+Q(H2O)=0

which is really confusing me.

Ok so if I let the lost energy be negative I get the same thing as the book does but then it seems to me like I'd get the same answer in every case.

The book's way:
-Q(Cu)-Q(Al)=Q(H2O)
Q(Cu)+Q(Al)+Q(H2O)=0

But then let's say Tf > 26 then we get

-Q(Cu)=Q(Al)+Q(H2O)

Which simplifies to

Q(Cu)+Q(Al)+Q(H2O)=0

exactly the same thing! That doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One material's loss is another material's gain. And a negative gain is a loss. You have a tendency to want to use positive numbers only, but the book allows negative Q too. Which is good if you consider that a ΔT can be < 0 !
 
Let Q(Cu) be the energy gained by copper.
Let Q(Al) be the energy gained by aluminum.
Let Q(H2O) be the energy gained by water.
If any of these turn out to be negative, it just means that that particular species lost energy. So,
Q(Cu)=0.1CCu(T-100) is the energy gained by Cu, where T is the final temperature, even if T is less than 100.
The same kind of thing for Al and H2O in terms of T.

If you do it this way, then Q(Cu)+Q(Al)+Q(H2O)=0 makes sense, since the sum of the three energy "gains" is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah that makes sense. Thx.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top