Thermal Physics, Kittel Chapter 2 problem 2

kde2520
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm just reposting this question that someone else asked a long time ago but got no responses. Any help would be great.

Hi,
Studying for my thermal physics final and want to make sure I'm doing this right as our book doesn't have answers. Pretty simple question so I need to make sure I'm doing the basics right.

Find the equilibrium value at temperature \tau of the fractional magnetization


\frac{M}{Nm} = \frac{2<s>}{N}


of the system of N spins each of magnetic moment m in a magnetic field B. The spin excess is 2s. Take the ntropy as the logarithm of the multiplicty g(N,S) where


{\sigma}(s) \approx {\sigma}_o - \frac{2s^2}{N}


where {\sigma}_o = \ln{g(N,0)} and g is the multiplicity function. Using the fact that U = 2smB, we can say


{\sigma}(U) = {\sigma}_o - \frac{U^2}{2m^2B^2N}


Now, the equilibrium of the system will occur when the entropy is maximized, so I take the derivative with respect the U, set it equal to zero, solve for U and then use that to find s. This gives me that <s> = 0 which makes sense as the temperature isn't going to affect whether you have spin up or spin down, right?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fractional magnetization should definitely be non-zero with a non-zero external magnetic field. I haven't solved that problem in a while, but there should definitely be a net magnetization.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top