Thermal resistance, can i do this?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating thermal resistance for a wall composed of three layers: fiberboard, concrete, and brick. The user seeks to simplify the calculation by combining the thermal resistances of each layer using the equation R = d/k, where d is thickness and k is thermal conductivity. They successfully calculate the total thermal resistance and derive an overall conductivity value for the wall. Other participants confirm that combining thermal resistances in series is valid, supporting the user's approach. The method appears to be correct, allowing for further calculations of heat transfer through the wall.
ShawnD
Science Advisor
Messages
715
Reaction score
2
I have this problem from my book here
A house has a wall made of 3 layers: fiberboard, concrete, brick where the fiberboard is on the inside of the house, brick is on the outside and concrete is in between.
the fiberboard is 0.02m thick, the concrete is 0.15m thick, the brick is 0.07m thick.
The thermal conductivity for fiberboard is 0.059, the concrete is 1.3, the brick is 0.71
the inside temperature is 20C, the outside temp is -10C
I'm supposed to find the amount of energy to conduct through the wall in 1 hour.

Since I have too many layers, I couldn't do the method of finding out temperature between the layers unless I made a pile of equations then put them in a matrix (which I hate doing).
I got the idea that I should try to make 1 big value for the conductivity of the wall.

Thermal resistance is given by this equation:
R = d/k where d is thickness and k is conductivity constant

I combined the resistances by simply adding them together (can I do this??)
[sum]R = d/k + d/k + d/k
[sum]R = 0.02/0.059 + 0.15/1.3 + 0.07/0.71
[sum]R = 0.504067

Then I rearrange the formula
R = d/k
Rk = d
k = d/R
k = (0.02 + 0.15 + 0.07)/0.504067
k = 0.476127 for the entire wall

Now that I got a k value for the entire wall, I just fill in for
Q = kA[del]Tt/d



Can I do the stuff I did with the adding of resistances like that or did I just do a bunch of voodoo math that is totally wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try

http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/~bsapplec/newpage218.htm

It seems to answer some bits of your question. From what I've found, it looks like you can combine thermal resistances in series the way you've done it.

Jess
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top