[Thermo] - Maxwells Relations? Prove the Validity of the Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter tesla22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relations Thermo
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the validity of Maxwell's relations in thermodynamics, specifically regarding equations involving second derivatives of thermodynamic potentials. The user initially misidentified the first equation but later corrected it to the form involving the Helmholtz free energy. They successfully derived the second and third relations using known thermodynamic identities but expressed difficulty with the first equation. A suggestion was made to differentiate the Helmholtz free energy's differential form twice with respect to volume at constant temperature to clarify the proof. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying variables and understanding thermodynamic relationships to solve the problems.
tesla22
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

We are working on some problems for class and we are given statements which I accept as valid but don't know how to prove they are valid. I believe I have to utilize the maxwell relations but the terms seem unfamiliar to me.

Homework Equations



(1)
Partial
(d^2f / ds^2)_T = T / Kv

(2)
Partial
(d^2h / ds^2)_P = T / C_p

(3)
Partial
(d^2u / ds^2)_v = T / C_v

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first equation, I know that the isothermal compressibiity K = -1/v partial(dv/dP)_T

For the second equation I also know that C_p/T = partial(ds/dT)_P = 1/T * partial(dh/dT)_P and i need to take this knowledge to combine the equations but I don't see how I would be getting the square on the ds out of this. Obviously I'm missing something.

C_v/T should be the same proof with u in place of h holding v constant.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank You, I think the answers were staring me in the face but in a different format and i didn't put 2 and 2 together until your response. I now have a solution where T=du/ds with v constant and T=dh/ds with p constant (correct?) and plugging these into the equations cv=T(ds/dt)_v and cp=T(dt/ds)_p to get the desired proof. I think its right.

I'm still struggling with the third one however so any assistance would be appreciated. How do you make the proper symbols appear?
 
The first relation can't be true, the units don't match up.
 
Mapes said:
The first relation can't be true, the units don't match up.

Yes that's the one I'm struggling with sorry, the first one. The 2nd and 3rd I believe I have proven as said in the previous post.

I completely screwed up the first one, the actual problem is as follows:

(d^2f / dv^2)_T = 1 / Kv

This is the one I am struggling with at the moment. Sorry I was trying too hard to convey the format of the problem that i got the variables wrong somehow.
 
OK, that makes a lot more sense. Try writing out the differential form of the Helmholtz free energy dF and taking the derivative of that twice with respect to V at constant T. The first derivative equals a well-known parameter.
 
Back
Top