Thermodynamics - Carnot Engine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between heat absorbed and rejected by reservoirs in an Ideal Gas Carnot engine, emphasizing the equations that define this relationship. For part (a), the user attempts to apply the Carnot efficiency formula but expresses uncertainty about its application. In part (b), the user struggles with calculating the temperature a house can maintain using a heat pump, ultimately arriving at a temperature of 275K, which they question for accuracy. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in understanding thermodynamic principles and the application of relevant equations. Assistance is sought for clarification and guidance on these thermodynamic concepts.
NavalChicken
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a.) For an Ideal Gas Carnot engine, what is the relationship between heat absorbed and rejected by the reservoirs and their temperature? If a heat pump is used to transfer this heat, what is the rate at which heat is added to the hot reservoir in terms of the temperatures of the reservoir and the work done by the pump?

(b.) A house is imperfectly insulated such that it can maintain a heat difference from its surroundings of 5K if it is heated solely by electrical power supplied to electric heaters. If the heaters are turned off and the same power is supplied to a heat pump that extracts heat from a reservoir at the same temperature of the surroundings, 270K, at what temperature can the house be maintained?

Homework Equations


\frac{Q_H}{Q_C} = \frac{\theta_H}{\theta_C}

and

\frac{Q_H}{W} = \frac{\theta_H}{\theta_H - \theta_C}

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a.) I have the first equation I posted above and

\frac{dQ_H}{dt} = \frac{\theta_H}{\theta_H - \theta_C} \frac{dW}{dt}

which I'm not entirely sure is what the question was looking for

In part (b) I've tried quite a few different things and keep going in circles! I think, with a lot of messy substitution I get the temperature to be 275K. As it was before, which seems consistent with conservation of energy, but I'm not sure its actually right?

This looks like quite a basic question, so its quite embarrassing to be having problems with it, if anyone has any helpful advice that would be great. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, one of the methods I used was:

\frac{dQ_H}{dt} = \frac{\theta_H}{\theta_H - \theta_C} \frac{dW}{dt}

Which, when \theta_H = 275 K and \theta_C = 270 K give \frac{dQ}{dt} = \frac{1}{55} \frac{dW}{dt}

But then I don't really know what to do with that?
 
Last edited:
anyone?
 
i need help with this one too!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top