Thermodynamics: Enthelpy and energy change of a column of air

Nyfinscyf
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A column of dry air, of cross-sectional area 1m2, has a surface pressure of 1atm. Over the course of several hours during the day it gains 2MJ of energy from radiation and surface heating. There are no horizontal exchanges of energy of mass, and it remains in hydrostatic equilibrium.

Does the surface pressure change?
What is the change in enthalpy, internal energy, and potential energy?

Area: 1m2
Energy gain: 2 MJ
Pressure: 1 atm

Homework Equations


H = U + pV
ΔH = ΔU + Δ(pV)
H=U+P = \int^{∞}_{0} ρ(c_v + R)T dz = \int^{∞}_{0} ρh dz
{\frac{∂U}{∂T}}=\frac{3}{2} Nk=C_v

Ideal gas - internal energy does not depend on volume.


The Attempt at a Solution


Surface pressure: Does not change as there is no change in mass of the column and so there is the same volume of air above the location.

I understand enthalpy increases because the internal energy increases from the gain in heating and radiation. But I don't understand how the potential energy increases nor do I understand how the math works. These formulas seem very vague to me.

How does the gain of energy increase the temperature mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And how can I calculate the change in enthalpy, internal energy and potential energy mathematically?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top