Thermodynamics - Enthelpy change in adiabatic expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the enthalpy change during the adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas in a steady flow process, with an initial pressure of 2.5 bar and a volume change from 1.2 m³ to 3.8 m³. The key equations involved include the work done (W = ∫ PdV) and the relationship ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV). Participants emphasize the importance of determining whether the process is reversible, as this affects the calculations. Clarification is sought on handling the Δ(PV) term and whether the assumption of reversibility is valid for a slow, steady flow process. The discussion highlights the complexity of using internal energy versus enthalpy for this scenario.
ScottHendo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas is carried out in a steady flow process. The initial pressure of the gas is 2.5 bar. The volume is expanded from 1.2m3 to 3.8m3. Heat capacity ratio (γ) = 1.42. Calculate enthalpy change of the process.

Homework Equations


PV = nRT

W = ∫ PdV

ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV)

PVγ = constant

The Attempt at a Solution


Calculate work done by using work done for steady flow process equation:
W = ∫ PdV with PVγ= constant to get W = constant ∫ (dV)/Vγ .
Carry out the integration to get W.
-W = ΔU
Then use ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV) to find enthalpy change.

I am looking for any help on 1) to make sure I am on the right track and 2) what to do with the Δ(PV) part of the last equation.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose the expansion is a reversible process. In a steady flow process ##W = \Delta H = c_p*(T_2-T_1)##. Working with internal energy seems to be correct but it much more complicated.
 
Is this the exact problem statement, or is there something that you left out? The answer is different if the flow is through a porous plug compared to a turbine featuring an adiabatic reversible expansion. Did you leave out the word “reversible” from your description?
 
I missed out that it is a slow steady flow process, would this mean that I could assume it is reversible?
 
Back
Top