Thermodynamics First law ideal gas question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial temperature of an ideal gas expanded from volume V1 to V2, where V2 is three times V1, and the work done during this reversible process is 9.4 KJ. Two methods are proposed: the first method incorrectly assumes work equals PV, while the second method correctly applies the formula for work in an isobaric process, PΔV. The second method leads to a calculation of 721 K for the initial temperature, which is debated regarding its correctness. Clarifications emphasize that the work done should be derived from the change in volume and that the initial temperature calculation should not include T2 in the formula. Ultimately, the correct initial temperature is determined to be approximately 706 K.
deeko1987
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have
0.0008 Kmol of an ideal gas are expanded from V1 to V2 v2=3V1
process is reversible and T/V=Constant

if the work obtained by this expansion is 9.4 KJ find the initial temperature

R=8.314 KJ Kmol-1

Homework Equations



PV=nRT

possibly T/V = T/V

The Attempt at a Solution



The method I thought to use is as follows.

PV=nRT we know work = 9.4KJ

9.4/nR = T2

T2/V2 = T1/V1

multiply T2/V2 by V1

and we get T2/3 (because the ratio is 1/3)

got 471.092 kelvin for T1

a class mate used this method

PV= 9.4KJ

Pressure is constant as t/v=constant

P(3V1-V1) = 9.4KJ

2PV1= 9.4 KJ (divide by 2)
PV1 = 4.8KJ

PV1=nRT2 = 4.8

solving for t

4.8/nR = 721

T1 = 721 kelvin

Could somebody please explain which method is correct to use and if it is the second method the how this works.In my view the work down at PV1 should not be equal to half the initial work done because the question states the work done expanding from V1 to V2. Also using the second method wouldn't that still be by definition T2 because although we have algebraically modified the
equation we still have T2 in the formula.

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
deeko1987 said:
The method I thought to use is as follows.

PV=nRT we know work = 9.4KJ
The work done equals PΔV, not PV. (When pressure is constant, of course.)
 
deeko1987 said:
Also using the second method wouldn't that still be by definition T2 because although we have algebraically modified the
equation we still have T2 in the formula.
There should not be a T2 in the formula. The second method uses PV1 = nRT1.
 
Actually, your class mate is right. You said that PV=nRT = 9,4 KJ, and that's not right. Remember that the general definition of work in thermodynamics is the integral of PdV. This is a isobaric process, so the expression turns to: P(Vf-Vi), or PΔV. It's the variation of volume!
Also, you used 4,8 instead of 4,7 for 2PV1= 9.4 KJ (divide by 2). I found 706 K for the initial temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes deeko1987
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top