Thermodynamics - monotomic/diatomig gas heat capacity question

AI Thread Summary
Monatomic gases like helium require less heat than diatomic gases like hydrogen for the same temperature increase due to differences in their molecular structure and energy modes. Helium, being monatomic, has fewer degrees of freedom, while diatomic gases can store energy in rotational and vibrational modes in addition to translational motion. The discussion references the equipartition theorem, which explains how energy is distributed among these modes. Understanding the heat capacities (Cp and Cv) of these gases is essential for grasping their thermal behavior. This fundamental difference in molecular behavior underlies the varying heat capacities of monatomic and diatomic gases.
p.ella
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Thermodynamics -- monotomic/diatomig gas heat capacity question

Homework Statement



GRADE 12 CHEMISTRY: Why would a monotomic gas like Helium require less heat than a diatomic gas like hydrogen to undergo the same temperature increase?


Homework Equations



q=mcΔT


The Attempt at a Solution



I think it has something to do with bonds and rotational/translational/vibrational energy of molecules but don't know exactly help

Thank you everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello p.ella,

The answer to your question maybe twofold.

First ask yourself this: How do the CP and CV values of helium compare with other gases?

Secondly, What kind of inter-molecular forces act between helium molecules? How do they compare with other gases?
 
Sunil Simha said:
Secondly, What kind of inter-molecular forces act between helium molecules? How do they compare with other gases?
Sorry Sunil, but I don't think that intermolecular forces are the right way to go.

p.ella, have you heard of the equipartition theorem?
 
DrClaude said:
Sorry Sunil, but I don't think that intermolecular forces are the right way to go.

p.ella, have you heard of the equipartition theorem?

Thanks anways Sunil :)

And no, I haven't, not yet atleast :)
 
p.ella said:
And no, I haven't, not yet atleast :)
That makes things a bit more difficult, but let's try it this way.

When heat is put into a monatomic gas, what changes?

If you have a diatomic molecule instead, what more can happen (in addition to what you just answered for the monatomic gas)?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top