Thermodynamics: Pouring Cream into Coffee

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the optimal timing for pouring cream into coffee from a thermodynamics perspective. The original poster sought feedback on their calculations, which were shared via a linked PDF. They later acknowledged errors in their work and expressed a desire to delete the post. The conversation highlights the complexities of thermodynamic principles in everyday scenarios like coffee preparation. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of accuracy in scientific calculations.
AvgStudent
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I did a general problem of the perfect time to pour cream into coffee.
I was hoping someone could check my work

It's in the pdf below:

docs(dot)google(dot)com/open?id=0Bx8zdkF5WYAbMl80UjI5U2lmdlU

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvm. I made mistakes ._. I don't know how to delete the post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top