Why is steel a better heat conductor than wood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics question regarding the thermal conductivity of materials, specifically comparing steel and wood. The correct answer to why a student's tongue would stick to a cold steel post instead of a wooden one is that steel is a better heat conductor. When the tongue contacts the cold steel, heat is rapidly transferred away, causing the tongue to freeze and stick. In contrast, wood has low thermal conductivity, which means it retains heat around the contact area, preventing the tongue from sticking. The key takeaway is that the thermal properties of materials significantly affect heat transfer and the risk of injury in such scenarios.
xyz
Hi,there
I got a question from my sample test. That is:

"After passing 2B with flying colors, you are called one winter to rescue a physics 10 student who unknowingly puts his tongue against a cold steel post. As you peel his tongue off the post, you knowingly explain that, next time, he should instead lick a wooden post because:
a)steel has a higher specific heat than wood
b)wood is not as good a radiator of heat
c)steel has a higher specific gracity
d)steel is a better heat conductor
e)wood is not magnetic

I guess the key to the question is D. If I am right, why? If not, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D is correct.

Metal is much better at conducting heat. Therefore if someone puts their tongue against cold metal, the metal will efficiently conduct heat away from tongue.

In wood it is different. Wood has low thermal conductivity, which means that the heat from the tongue will remain localised around the contact area, which would prevent any tongues getting stuck to it.
 


Yes, the correct answer is D) steel is a better heat conductor. This means that heat can transfer more easily through steel compared to wood. When the student's tongue comes into contact with the cold steel post, the heat from their tongue is quickly transferred to the post, causing their tongue to freeze and stick. However, if the student had licked a wooden post instead, the heat from their tongue would not transfer as easily to the post, allowing their tongue to stay warm and not stick. This is because wood is a poorer conductor of heat compared to steel. I hope this helps!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top