Thermodynamics solution, but why Cp*1000 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psilocybin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem where the term Cp is multiplied by 1000 to convert units from kJ/kg to kW. This conversion is necessary to ensure that both terms in the equation are expressed in compatible energy units, specifically kJ/s, to maintain consistency in calculations. The confusion arises because the kinetic energy term, when neglected, does not require this conversion. The clarification emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in thermodynamic equations. Overall, the focus is on understanding the rationale behind unit conversions in energy transport calculations.
psilocybin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there! I have attached an example problem from my thermodynamics textbook, and I understand everything except part (c)

m( h + ke ) = m(c p T + V^2/2)
where Cp is multiplied by 1000 (or ke/1000 as shown in solution.)

why is this part done? I cannot figure it out at all. I see that it is to get the answer in terms of watts rather than kW, but I feel like I am missing something conceptually. In the following step when KE is ignored, it is not done...

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Heres the original question if additional context is needed:

Air flows steadily in a pipe at 300 kPa, 77°C, and
25 m/s at a rate of 18 kg/min. Determine (a) the diameter of
the pipe, (b) the rate of flow energy, (c) the rate of energy
transport by mass, and (d ) the error involved in part (c) if the
kinetic energy is neglected.
 

Attachments

  • 5-24.jpg
    5-24.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 467
Physics news on Phys.org
Cp is not multiplied by 1000 anywhere, so I don't know where you're getting that.

The last factor in parentheses in the second term is just a unit conversion. Here are two equivalent ways of explaining it.

1. The first term is in kJ/kg, which when multiplied by kg/s gives you kJ/s, or kW. These are the units you want your answer to be in. However, the second term, which is in m^2/s^2, when multiplied by kg/s, gives you J/s, or W, which is not the same. To express the second term in kJ/s rather than J/s, you have to divide it by 1000.

2. You'll notice that the first term is in kJ/kg, which when multiplied by kg/s gives you kJ/s. So, you want the second term to be in kJ/kg as well. Recall that [energy]/[mass] = [speed]^2. The second term is in m^2/s^2. To express this in kJ/kg, we need the conversion factor, which is that 1 kJ/kg = 1000 m^2/s^2. This makes sense, since 1 J/kg = 1 m^2/s^2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks, in an alternate handwritten solution it was written with Cp*1000 which started the confusion. The last couple sentences really summed it up. Unfortunately this class has mostly been taught as a "plug these numbers from the table into these formulas" and a lot of the intuition has been lost. Thank you for the assistance!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top