Thermodynamics solution, but why Cp*1000 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psilocybin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the necessity of multiplying the specific heat capacity (Cp) by 1000 in thermodynamic calculations to ensure unit consistency when converting energy terms. The equation m(h + ke) = m(c p T + V^2/2) involves terms in different units; specifically, the first term is in kJ/kg, while the second term, representing kinetic energy, is in m²/s². To convert the kinetic energy term to kJ/kg, it must be divided by 1000, aligning both terms to kJ/s for coherent energy transport calculations. This conversion is essential for accurate energy transport analysis in thermodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, particularly energy transport.
  • Familiarity with unit conversions in thermodynamics.
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacity (Cp) and its role in energy calculations.
  • Basic proficiency in interpreting equations related to fluid dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of energy transport in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about unit conversions in thermodynamic equations.
  • Explore the implications of kinetic energy in fluid flow calculations.
  • Investigate the role of specific heat capacity in energy equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics and fluid dynamics, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in thermodynamic concepts.

psilocybin
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there! I have attached an example problem from my thermodynamics textbook, and I understand everything except part (c)

m( h + ke ) = m(c p T + V^2/2)
where Cp is multiplied by 1000 (or ke/1000 as shown in solution.)

why is this part done? I cannot figure it out at all. I see that it is to get the answer in terms of watts rather than kW, but I feel like I am missing something conceptually. In the following step when KE is ignored, it is not done...

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Heres the original question if additional context is needed:

Air flows steadily in a pipe at 300 kPa, 77°C, and
25 m/s at a rate of 18 kg/min. Determine (a) the diameter of
the pipe, (b) the rate of flow energy, (c) the rate of energy
transport by mass, and (d ) the error involved in part (c) if the
kinetic energy is neglected.
 

Attachments

  • 5-24.jpg
    5-24.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 485
Physics news on Phys.org
Cp is not multiplied by 1000 anywhere, so I don't know where you're getting that.

The last factor in parentheses in the second term is just a unit conversion. Here are two equivalent ways of explaining it.

1. The first term is in kJ/kg, which when multiplied by kg/s gives you kJ/s, or kW. These are the units you want your answer to be in. However, the second term, which is in m^2/s^2, when multiplied by kg/s, gives you J/s, or W, which is not the same. To express the second term in kJ/s rather than J/s, you have to divide it by 1000.

2. You'll notice that the first term is in kJ/kg, which when multiplied by kg/s gives you kJ/s. So, you want the second term to be in kJ/kg as well. Recall that [energy]/[mass] = [speed]^2. The second term is in m^2/s^2. To express this in kJ/kg, we need the conversion factor, which is that 1 kJ/kg = 1000 m^2/s^2. This makes sense, since 1 J/kg = 1 m^2/s^2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks, in an alternate handwritten solution it was written with Cp*1000 which started the confusion. The last couple sentences really summed it up. Unfortunately this class has mostly been taught as a "plug these numbers from the table into these formulas" and a lot of the intuition has been lost. Thank you for the assistance!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K