Thermos Heat Loss: Solving Differential Equations for Changing Temperatures

espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A thermos consists of two layers (see fig). The core contains a liquid with temperature T_1. The outer layer contains air at low pressure with temperature T_2. The surrounding air has temperature T_3. At t=0, T_2=T_3. Assume that T_3 does not change with time, and that temperature is conserved between the core and outer layer. What is the magnitude of T_2 after t seconds?

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/3128/termos.png

Homework Equations



Heat equation: \frac{dT}{dt}=k\Delta T

The Attempt at a Solution



First I write down the differential equations for each temperature and layer:

\frac{dT_1}{dt}=k_1(T_2-T_1)

\frac{dT_2}{dt}_1=k_1(T_1-T_2)

\frac{dT_2}{dt}_2=k_2(T_3-T_2)

\frac{dT_2}{dt}=k_1(T_1-T_2)+k_2(T_3-T_2)

\frac{dT_3}{dt}=0

Since I have two functions to deal with, T_1 and T_2, I set up a set of differential equations with two functions:

\frac{dT_2}{dt}=-T_2(k_1+k_2)+k_1T_1+k_2T_3

\frac{dT_1}{dt}=k_1(T_2-T_1)

How do I solve this set of differential equations. I don't think I can solve them one by one, since neither T_1 or T_2 is constant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a system of coupled differential equations that you need to decouple. To do this,

1. Solve the second equation for T2 to get T2= (blah, blah, blah).
2. Replace T2 with (blah, blah, blah) on the right side of the first equation.
3. Replace the left side of the first equation with the time derivative of (blah, blah, blah).

This leaves you with a second order differential equation in T1.
 
Okay, thanks for the help!

I solve the second equation for T_2, obtaining

T_2=T_1+\frac{1}{k_1}\frac{dT_1}{dt}

and

\frac{dT_2}{dt}=\frac{dT_1}{dt}+\frac{1}{k_1}\frac{d^2T_1}{dt^2}

Putting it into the second equation gives me

\frac{dT_1}{dt}+\frac{1}{k_1}\frac{d^2T_1}{dt^2}=-(k_1+k_2)(T_1+\frac{1}{k_1}\frac{dT_1}{dt})+k_1T_1+k_2T_3

leaving me with

\frac{d^2T_1}{dt^2}+(2k_1+k_2)\frac{dT_1}{dt}+k_1k_2T_1-k_1k_2T_3=0

Solving this yields

T_1=C_1e^{-\frac{1}{2}t(\sqrt{4k_1^2+k_2^2}-2k_1-k_2)}+C_2e^{\frac{1}{2}t(\sqrt{4k_1^2+k_2^2}-2k_1-k_2)}+T_3

I wonder if this expression is an accurate description of how heat really transfers out of a thermos. For positive values of C_2, the function increases. That can't be, because T_1>T_2\geq T_3. For negative values, it quickly drops to 0 K, absolute zero. That's illogical, because the function should approximate to T_3 after a long time. The only way for that to happen is if C_2=0. Do you agree?

T_1=(T_1)_0e^{-\frac{1}{2}t(\sqrt{4k_1^2+k_2^2}-2k_1-k_2)}+T_3

I replaced C_1 with (T_1)_0 because it is the value of T_1 at t=0.

\frac{dT_1}{dt}=-(T_1)_0e^{-\frac{1}{2}t(\sqrt{4k_1^2+k_2^2}-2k_1-k_2)}(\frac{1}{2}(\sqrt{4k_1^2+k_2^2}-2k_1-k_2))
 
Your model is not correct. You completely neglect the spatial aspect. The temperature in the region you have labeled T2 is not and will not be constant. It will be T1 adjacent to the inner boundary and T3 at the outer boundary. If you assume pure conduction (a bad assumption by the way!) then there will be continuous gradient in the T2 region.

You have also neglected material properties of the liquid in the center, the walls of the container and the air in the gap.

The wiki article on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_equation"



Edit:
I should also mention that what you are calling the heat equation is simply not correct. See the wiki artical on the heat equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top