Thevenin Equivalent Circuits with Dependent Source

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 12K views
simba9071
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
May anyone please help with the method of getting Thevenin Equivalent resistance (RTH) for the attached circuit. I have already found VTH to be 8V.

View attachment ECA.doc

Sim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't looked at the circuit, but since you say it has dependent sources, the usual way to go about this is to connect a voltage source of generic EMF [tex]e_g[/tex] between the two points, turn off all the independent sources, and then solve this circuit. Now, you use [tex]R_\text{Th} = \frac{e_g}{i_g}[/tex] where [tex]i_g[/tex] is the current going through the voltage source, where active references are used for voltage and current. If you've done everything right, [tex]e_g[/tex] will be a linear function of [tex]i_g[/tex] and you can simplify when you do the division.

This is for the Thévenin resistance - for the Thévenin EMF, all you need is the voltage drop between the two points when you open the circuit, as always.

Hope this helps. :)
 
Metaleer said:
I haven't looked at the circuit, but since you say it has dependent sources, the usual way to go about this is to connect a voltage source of generic EMF [tex]e_g[/tex] between the two points, turn off all the independent sources, and then solve this circuit. Now, you use [tex]R_\text{Th} = \frac{e_g}{i_g}[/tex] where [tex]i_g[/tex] is the current going through the voltage source, where active references are used for voltage and current. If you've done everything right, [tex]e_g[/tex] will be a linear function of [tex]i_g[/tex] and you can simplify when you do the division.

This is for the Thévenin resistance - for the Thévenin EMF, all you need is the voltage drop between the two points when you open the circuit, as always.

Hope this helps. :)

I'm not sure if we have to treat a dependent source differently from a independent source when measuring resistance. Because you can also find a non-zero resistance in independent sources using your formula
[tex]R = \frac{V}{I}[/tex].
Dependent source definitely contributes to [tex]V_\text{Th}[/tex].
For the circuit I see,
Rth = 2//8 = 1.6 ohms.
 
Neandethal00 said:
I'm not sure if we have to treat a dependent source differently from a independent source when measuring resistance. Because you can also find a non-zero resistance in independent sources using your formula
[tex]R = \frac{V}{I}[/tex].
Dependent source definitely contributes to [tex]V_\text{Th}[/tex].
For the circuit I see,
Rth = 2//8 = 1.6 ohms.

I'm not sure what you mean. All independent sources need to be switched off to measure the equivalent Thévenin resistance between two terminals, and dependent sources need to be left there.