Can I Transform Diode in Parallel for V_out vs. I_in Graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElijahRockers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming a diode in parallel for a V_out vs. I_in graph. The original poster successfully used Norton-Thevenin transformations for previous questions but struggles with the diode's behavior in parallel. It is suggested that the diode can be modeled as a resistor that changes value based on current direction, leading to two different source models depending on whether the diode is conducting. The diode acts as a voltage clamp across R1, affecting the voltage output based on the polarity of I_in. Ultimately, the transformation is deemed impractical due to the need to determine when the diode is conducting, complicating the analysis.
ElijahRockers
Gold Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



Graph V_out as a function of I_in

540x405.png


Attempt:

I was able to complete the previous three questions by doing norton-thevenin source transformations and getting a single voltage source, which let me figure out the appropriate value of I_in for which the diode operates.

But with the diode in parallel I'm not sure I can transform. Can I do this?:

540x405.png


If so, then that will allow me to draw a graph, but the diode in parallel threw me off.

EDIT: The voltage in the last diagram shouldn't have a value of 1V associated with it, this exercise involves no specific values for any components
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a bit tricky. You can think of the diode as a resistor in parallel with R1, but it's a resistor that changes value depending upon the direction of the current that wants to pass through it. Your transformed source model will have two versions: one where the diode is conducting and one where the diode is not conducting. Bit of a catch-22 there, since you need to know which model to apply when, in order to find out which model to apply...

It might be simpler to consider the direction of current flow imposed by I_in over its domain and model the diode accordingly in the different conditions.

Alternatively, you might think of the diode as a "voltage clamp" across R1 which allows the voltage to increase in the usual Ohm's law fashion in one polarity, but clamps it to the diode forward voltage (0V for ideal diode) in the other. Sketch the voltage across R1 without the diode present, then add the effect of the clamp. Vout is just the VR1 voltage curve shifted up by Vb.
 
So when I_in > 0, V_out is just the voltage drop across Vb and R1, and if I_in < 0 it would be Vd + Vb?

Also, I'm assuming my attempt at source transforming is wrong, because of the diode, right?
 
Last edited:
ElijahRockers said:
So when I_in > 0, V_out is just the voltage drop across Vb and R1, and if I_in < 0 it would be Vd + Vb?
That's the big picture, yes. You might have to pay a bit of attention to the details when I_in is negative but small so that the potential drop across R1 is less than Vd (the diode doesn't start conducting until the drop across R1 exceeds Vd).
Also, I'm assuming my attempt at source transforming is wrong, because of the diode, right?

Not so much wrong as impractical. There will be two distinct versions of the transformation (current, resistance) which depend upon whether or not the diode is conducting or not. You need to know when to apply which version for a given value of I_in. But since that's essentially what you're trying to find out, life will just get more complicated... :smile:
 
gneill said:
life will just get more complicated... :smile:

Well. Spring break is here so, at least for the moment, life will be simpler. :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top