Thin Film Interference problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Thin Film Interference produces constructive or destructive interference based on the phase changes of light rays reflecting off different media. The equation 2t = mλ is crucial, where t is the film thickness and λ is the wavelength. When light reflects off a medium with a higher refractive index (n2 > n1), it undergoes a 1/2 λ phase change. Conversely, when reflecting off a lower refractive index (n3 < n2), there is no phase change. This results in constructive interference when both rays experience a 1/2 λ phase change and destructive interference when only one does.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thin Film Interference principles
  • Familiarity with the equation 2t = mλ
  • Knowledge of refractive indices (n1, n2, n3)
  • Basic concepts of wave phase changes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of varying film thickness on interference patterns
  • Explore applications of Thin Film Interference in optical coatings
  • Learn about the role of wavelength in determining interference outcomes
  • Investigate real-world examples of Thin Film Interference in nature and technology
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, educators teaching optics, and professionals working in optical engineering or materials science.

sdobbers
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I was wondering if someone could explain to me when Thin Film Interference will produce constructive/destructive interference. I think I might understand it, but I'm not 100% sure and I have a test coming up soon. Any help would be great!

Ok, so I know we have the equation:
2t = m\lambda

where t, is the distance the thickness of the film, and \lambda is the wavelength.

Say we have...

-------
n1
-------
n2
-------
n3

Where n1 = air, n2 > n1 and n2 > n3. So then would the part of the ray reflecting off n2, have a 1/2 \lambda phase change? But the ray reflecting off of n3 would undergo no phase change?? Would this produce destructive interference?

What about when n2 > n1, and n3 > n2. I'm guessing that both the ray that reflects off n2, and off n3 would both undergo 1/2 \lambda phase change, so this would be constructive?

Or is it reversed?
 
Science news on Phys.org
sdobbers said:
Where n1 = air, n2 > n1 and n2 > n3. So then would the part of the ray reflecting off n2, have a 1/2 \lambda phase change? But the ray reflecting off of n3 would undergo no phase change?? Would this produce destructive interference?

What about when n2 > n1, and n3 > n2. I'm guessing that both the ray that reflects off n2, and off n3 would both undergo 1/2 \lambda phase change, so this would be constructive?
You got it.
 
Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K