How to Calculate Optimal Thickness for Thin-Film Optical Coatings

  • Thread starter Thread starter pphy427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
AI Thread Summary
To achieve the desired optical effects in dichroic glass, the thickness of the MgF2 coating must be calculated to maximize blue reflection at 519 nm while minimizing red transmission at 692 nm. The relevant equations for constructive and destructive interference are provided, with constructive thickness calculated as λm / 2n and destructive thickness as λ(m - 0.5) / 2n. Users discussed strategies for finding suitable m values that satisfy both conditions, emphasizing the need for guess-and-check methods. A phase change due to the refractive index must also be considered, particularly for the blue maximum. Ultimately, solving for the optimal thickness involves balancing these equations to achieve the desired color effects.
pphy427
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A jewelry maker has asked your glass studio to produce a sheet of dichroic glass that will appear red (wavelength=692 nm) for transmitted light and blue (wavelength=519 nm) for reflected light. If you use a MgF2 coating (n=1.39), how thick should the coating be.


Homework Equations



for constructive interference: lambda = (2nd)/m
for destructive interference: lambda = (2nd)/(m-.5)


The Attempt at a Solution


Both constructive and destructive interference of the reflected waves are required here, at different wavelengths. I think we need to minimize the red for reflection and maximize the blue. I really don't know how to make sense of this problem. I'm sorry I don't have a better attempt. I will really appreciate any help you can offer. Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having the same issue with this same problem. Just to rephrase the formulas,

Constructive Thickness = \lambdam / 2*n
Destructive Thickness = \lambda(m-.5) / 2*n

I figured the same; that we wanted to maximize blue reflection and minimize red. So far, I've tried solving for the value that makes the red destructive, and tried a few multiples of it (in other words, a few m values) in comparison to the blue construcive in hope I'd find an integer match (ie a 5/4 or something ratio so I can figure the m's), but no luck on that. I've only got one crack at it left, so I want to make sure I get it.
 
ok, I've been working at this one and i think it's way easier than i thought it was.

we know that the film is the same in both conditions so if we solve both the constructive and destructive formulas for "d" we can find a corresponding "m" value. whether you use the situation where blue is constructive and red is destructive or vice versa, you'll eventually get the same answer.
 
I see what you mean. Got it to work; I used m=2. Just takes a little guess-and-check.

Thanks
 
DD31 said:
I'm having the same issue with this same problem. Just to rephrase the formulas,

Constructive Thickness = \lambdam / 2*n
Destructive Thickness = \lambda(m-.5) / 2*n

I figured the same; that we wanted to maximize blue reflection and minimize red. So far, I've tried solving for the value that makes the red destructive, and tried a few multiples of it (in other words, a few m values) in comparison to the blue construcive in hope I'd find an integer match (ie a 5/4 or something ratio so I can figure the m's), but no luck on that. I've only got one crack at it left, so I want to make sure I get it.
However, you have to take into account the phase change due to n=1.54. So in this case, the equation for blue max is t= \lambda(m+.5) / 2*n
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top