Solve Thin-Lens Equation: Prove u=v, Find Focal Length Change

  • Thread starter Thread starter sci0x
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that an object at twice the focal length from a converging lens results in an image of the same size, the algebraic method shows that u equals v when using the thin lens equation. For a convex lens with a focal length of 5cm, moving from an object distance of 50cm to infinity requires calculating the image distances for both scenarios. The film must be positioned 50cm from the lens for the closest object, while for distant objects, the lens must be adjusted accordingly. Understanding the relationship between object distance, image distance, and focal length is crucial for solving these problems. This discussion emphasizes the application of the thin lens equation in practical scenarios.
sci0x
Messages
83
Reaction score
5
Question
i)
Prove that if an object is at a distance of twice the focal length from a converging lens, the image is the same size as the object. Show this using an algebraic method.

Possible Answer
Must prove u = v
2F = U
2/u + 2/v = u
u + v = 2u
v=u

ii)
A small hand-held camera has a convex lens with a focal length of 5cm. The camera is arranged so that by moving the lens in and out, objects from 50cm away to "infinity" (very remote objects like mountains and scenery) can be brought to an exact focus on the film. How many centimeters will the lens have to be moved as the focus is changed from the closest to the farthest object?

Possible Answer:
Well, F = 5cm
U = 50cm
No I can't do this, could someone explain it please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solutions for both of these questions involve the thin lens equation. For (i) using the object distance and focal lenth will allow you to solve for the image distance. Then using a similar triangle argument you can show that the two heights are the same.

For (ii), find the image distances for each of the the two distances (50cm and infinity). Since objects at 50cm are the nearest objects that can be imaged, the flim must be located this far away from the lens... Hopefully this will start you along the right track.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top