This summation sums to zero. Why?

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hi,

I am reading a paper, and at some point the authors claim that:

\sum_{m=1}^{L+1}\frac{\prod_{\substack{l=1\\l\neq m}}^{L+1}\frac{\lambda(m)}{\lambda(m)-\lambda(l)}}{\lambda^r(m)}=0

the question is HOW?

Any tiny hint will be highly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general there is no equality.
It must depend on the definitions of λ, r and L.
Can you provide more details?
 
Amir Livne said:
In general there is no equality.
It must depend on the definitions of λ, r and L.
Can you provide more details?

Lambdas are positive numbers, r is between 1 and L. That is all
 
I don't think that is correct.

Define \lambda(m)=m, and pick L=r=2. Then
\frac{\frac{\lambda(1)}{\left(\lambda(1)-\lambda(2)\right)\left(\lambda(1)-\lambda(3)\right)}}{\lambda(1)^2}+\frac{\frac{\lambda(2)}{\left(\lambda(2)-\lambda(1)\right)\left(\lambda(2)-\lambda(3)\right)}}{\lambda(2)^2}+\frac{\frac{\lambda(3)}{\left(\lambda(3)-\lambda(1)\right)\left(\lambda(3)-\lambda(2)\right)}}{\lambda(3)^2}=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{6}=\frac{1}{6}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top