This upper limit is wrong I need a help

  • Thread starter Thread starter norbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
norbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
this upper limit is wrong...! I need a help

I have some concerns about this text:


it can easily be shown that F satisfies all the criteria of a vector space. As an example, we demostrate that if


\psi_{1}(r) and \psi_{2}(r) \in F

both can be cosidered to be complex functions
then:

\psi(r) = \lambda_{1}\psi_{1}(r) + \lambda_{2}\psi_{2}(r) \in F (A-1)


where \lambda_{1} and \lambda_{2} are two arbitrary complex numbers

In order to show that \psi(r)^{2} is square integrable

expand \psi(r)^{2} :

\psi(r)^{2} = |\lambda_{1}|^{2}|\psi_{1}(r)|^{2} + |\lambda_{2}|^{2} |\psi_{2}(r)|^{2} + \lambda_{1}^\ast\lambda_2\psi_1^\ast(r)\psi_2(r) + \lambda_1\lambda_2^\ast\psi_1(r)\psi_2^\ast(r) (A-2)

(*) simbol means complex-conjugate

The last two terms of (A-2) have the same modulus, which has as an upper limit:

----- |\lambda_{1}||\lambda_{2}| . [ |\psi_{1}(r)|^{2} + |\psi_{2}(r)|^{2}] -----


|\psi(r)|^{2} is therefore smaller than a function whose integral converges, since \psi_{1}(r) and \psi_{2}(r) are square-integrable

The questions are:

Why has the author used the above expression as "upper limit" term?

How did he obtain this expression?

What is the relation of this question with "triangular inequality" referred to complex-variable?

see --- Churchill complex variables and applications ----
can anybody explain me it a little better?

all suggestions will be welcome



thank you all
 
Physics news on Phys.org


As for why: He used that to show that each term is integrable, by showing that |ψ(r)|2 is smaller than a combination of integrable functions, so that |ψ(r)|2 is integrable.

As for how: That follows from the fact that 2ab ≤ a2 + b2. (This can be proven by noting that 0 ≤ (a - b)2 = a2 + b2 -2ab.) In this case, a = |ψ1(r)| and b = |ψ2(r)|. I don't see any immediate connection with the triangle inequality.
 


Hi adriank
I am grateful for your help
really there is no connection with the triangle inequality
I can set the last two terms of (A-3) equation to constant a and b respectively
hence using the 2ab < a^2 + b^2 relation I can obtain the upper limit:

|\lambda_{1}||\lambda_{2}| . [ |\psi_{1}(r)|^{2} + |\psi_{2}(r)|^{2}]

since these terms have the same modulus

thank you
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top