Thought experiment: Implosion reaction

In summary, the idea of using a nuclear bomb to generate a black hole and vaporize an area is not feasible due to the low energy level of the reactions involved and the inability to isolate the matter/antimatter reaction. Additionally, concerns about fallout and neutron irradiation make this idea highly speculative and impractical.
  • #1
Hummingbird25
86
0
I have question.

If we take an ordernary nuclear bomb and inject anti-matter into the core, and find a way to isolate the matter/antimatter reaction from the rest of detonation.

Would it be possible to use force of the nuclear bomb to generate a black hole and thereby vaporize an entire area (without nuclear fallout being present afterwards)?

In order to isolate the matter/antimatter reaction could this be done by some sort of gride? Maybe of hydrogen is that powefull enough?

/Hummingbird
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hummingbird25 said:
If we take an ordernary nuclear bomb and inject anti-matter into the core, and find a way to isolate the matter/antimatter reaction from the rest of detonation -

Would it be possible to use force of the nuclear bomb to generate a black hole . . . ?
NO! Any anti-matter (~ GeV), fission (~ 200 MeV) or fusion (0.1- ~22 MeV) reaction has an extraordinary low energy level compared to something like a black hole. There have been repeated concerns about the formation of black holes in conjunction with TeV events proposed in the LHC. That isn't going to happen.

Furthermore, one cannot isolate a matter/anti-matter reaction in the core of nuclear weapon, fission or fusion.

I'm locking the thread because this is highly speculative. Furthermore, if an entire area is vaporized - why would one be concerned about fallout? Neutron irradiation is a by-product of nuclear fission and D+T (50% of D+D) fusion. Even if fallout was minimized, one still has activated ground from the neutron irradiation.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


This thought experiment raises some interesting ideas, but it is important to note that it is purely hypothetical and not currently possible with our current technology and understanding of physics. While it is true that combining matter and antimatter can release a tremendous amount of energy, creating a black hole requires an incredible amount of mass and energy. It is unlikely that injecting antimatter into a nuclear bomb would be enough to generate a black hole.

Even if it were possible to generate a black hole, it is not clear how isolating the matter/antimatter reaction from the rest of the detonation would prevent nuclear fallout. The explosion itself would still release a significant amount of radiation and debris that could potentially cause harm to the surrounding area.

Additionally, using a grid of hydrogen to isolate the reaction would not be feasible as hydrogen is not strong enough to contain such a powerful explosion. It would likely be destroyed in the process.

Overall, while this thought experiment is interesting, it is important to remember that it is not currently possible and there are many unknowns and potential risks involved. It is always important to approach scientific and technological advancements with caution and careful consideration.
 

1. What is a thought experiment?

A thought experiment is a hypothetical scenario used to explore the consequences of a specific idea or theory. It allows scientists to test their theories and ideas without physically conducting an experiment.

2. What is an implosion reaction?

An implosion reaction is a type of nuclear reaction in which energy is released by compressing a substance, such as a core of a nuclear bomb, until it reaches a critical mass. This results in a rapid and powerful release of energy.

3. How is an implosion reaction different from an explosion reaction?

An explosion reaction releases energy by expanding or breaking apart a substance, while an implosion reaction releases energy by compressing a substance. In an implosion reaction, the energy is directed inward, whereas in an explosion reaction, the energy is directed outward.

4. What is the purpose of using a thought experiment to study an implosion reaction?

Using a thought experiment allows scientists to explore the potential consequences of an implosion reaction without actually conducting a dangerous and expensive nuclear experiment. It also allows them to make predictions and test different scenarios to better understand the behavior of implosion reactions.

5. Are thought experiments considered valid in the scientific community?

Yes, thought experiments are considered a valid and valuable tool in the scientific community. They have been used by many famous scientists, such as Albert Einstein, to develop and test theories. However, they should always be accompanied by physical experiments to validate their results.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
938
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
734
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top