Three Charges Problem: Sketching the Motion of Charges Released from Rest

  • Thread starter Thread starter superconduct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the motion of three charges released from rest and the expected paths they will take. Participants analyze the forces acting on the charges, noting that the attractive force between the charges P and Q should initially cause them to curve away from each other. However, as charge R moves, the dynamics change, leading to a potential attraction when the charges become collinear. There is a consensus that the book's question is poorly articulated, failing to clarify the initial motion versus the subsequent behavior of the charges. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of charge interactions and the need for clearer instructional materials.
superconduct
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
20130322_193009.jpg


Roughly sketch the path of each charge if they are released from rest at the same time, and are allowed to move freely.

Here is my sketch :
20130322_193246.jpg


The model answer:
20130322_193027.jpg


Please tell me what is wrong with my sketch. Once R moves to the left side, PR and QR will be shorter than PQ. Attractive electric force on P outweighs the repulsive, similarly for Q. Shouldn't P and Q bend towards R instead of away? Consider when P, Q and R are collinear, there should be a net attractive force between P and Q?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeah, It is not very clear. I think what the book means is that to begin with, the particles will curve away from each other. And what the book doesn't say is that they will then start to curve back towards each other, when the negative charge gets in-between them.

So I think your answer is correct. (Although they might not curve all the way into each other, since they might be already going too fast, and never manage to meet with each other). But also, as the book says they will initially curve away from each other.

The book seems to expect the answer to what will happen initially. But it is not clear about this, so It is a badly-written question, I think.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top