Solving for equations of motion in a system of three coupled oscillators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of formulating equations of motion for a system of three coupled oscillators, each mass connected by springs. The user is struggling to reconcile the Lagrangian and Newtonian approaches, particularly regarding the contributions of the springs to the forces acting on each mass. It is clarified that the force on the middle mass depends on the displacements of its neighboring masses, leading to a tri-diagonal matrix representation for acceleration and displacement. The potential energy terms for the springs are debated, with suggestions on how to define them based on the separations between the masses. Ultimately, understanding the coupling between the masses is essential for correctly modeling the system.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hello all.

I am having a substantially difficult time with what should be, actually, a very simple problem.

I have three masses, each with a spring on each side (so three masses and four springs total in the system). My problem is writing down the equations of motion. I can do it when there are two masses and three springs, but I'm not sure what's happening with this many. I tried writing down the Lagrangian to compare to my Newtonian equations of motion, but they weren't the same, so somethings definitely wrong with one (or both) of them.

Basically, the problem is - assuming mass one is displaced to the right, we have a term with k2(x2-x1) where k2 is the second spring constant, and x2-x1 is the separation distance between mass 1 and 2. But now we also have another spring on the other side of mass 2, so do I need another term for k3(x3-x2)?

What happens with the middle spring?

Also, I prefer the Lagrangian method.. it just may not be right because of the same problem. Would the potential energy spring extensions be something like x1, x1-x2,x2-x3 and -x3? That's what I used for constructing my potential energies, but not sure these separations are correct...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the Lagrangian representation, but yes, the force on each mass depends on the displacement of its neighbours. This is the definition of coupling.
Essentially the acceleration and displacement are related by a matrix that is tri?diagonal.

If I remember correctly it is reasonably easy to find some special solutions for an infinite chain, eg harmonic waves. A terminated chain will be slightly more complicated.

Not sure what you mean by middle spring... for a 3mass/4spring system there is a middle mass but not middle spring. The middle mass has force k(x1-2x2+x3).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
131
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top