Threshold frequency of metals

Olly_price
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Is there fixed data for the threshold frequency of metals?

For example, is it possible to find out the threshold frequency of iron or copper?

OR

does threshold frequency vary so greatly that with 2 blocks of iron, the theshold frequency could differ between them?

Depending on the answer, do you know of anywhere online where I could find the threshold frequency of various metals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a pure element, it's fixed.

Here is a link that should help.

http://www.standnes.no/chemix/periodictable/ionization-potential-table.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this about the photoelectric effect?
 
Olly_price said:
Is there fixed data for the threshold frequency of metals?

For example, is it possible to find out the threshold frequency of iron or copper?

OR

does threshold frequency vary so greatly that with 2 blocks of iron, the theshold frequency could differ between them?

Depending on the answer, do you know of anywhere online where I could find the threshold frequency of various metals?

Wiki gives a list of work functions of metals here (chart at bottom of page) from which you can derive the threshold frequencies.;;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function

Creator
 
jtbell said:
Is this about the photoelectric effect?

After reading about the photoelectric effect, I posted this so I suppose you could say it is, yes
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top