Throwing and dropping two balls: Find height where they meet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tulpje
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Height
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving two balls: one thrown upwards from a 100m tower and another released two seconds later. The equations of motion for both balls are established, with the first ball's position given as s1 = 100 + 15t - 4.9t^2 and the second ball's position as s2 = 100 - 4.9(t-2)^2. The key challenge is determining the time and height at which the two balls meet, with calculations leading to a meeting time of approximately 4.26 seconds and a height of about 75 meters. Participants clarify the importance of correctly accounting for the direction of initial velocity and the timing of the balls' motions. The discussion emphasizes understanding the motion equations and the graphical representation of their paths.
Tulpje
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You throw one ball vertically (V0= 15m/s) on top of a 100m tower. Two seconds later you release another ball from rest from the same tower.
Create a motion equation for both balls
At what moment do they pass each other?
At what height?

Homework Equations


s=vt+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


First I thought I could figure out how long it took the first stone to come back down to the height of the top of the tower (where the other ball was released) and came up with about 3.06s via
V0/a or 15/9.8 then multiply by two. Because this would reach 0 one second after ball two, I then made s=s with t-1 for ball one and t for ball two.

I then came out to a formula: -4.9t^2=15t-15-4.9t^2+9.8t-4.9
After solving I got t=0.407 but if I insert this into the formulas (1/2*-9.8*t^2) and 15*(t-1)+1/2*-9.8*(t-1)^2 to find the distance that they have traveled it never works out.
I have tried this in many different ways, including starting from the beginning with t-2 for ball two and still I come up with numbers that don't work.

I think I am having trouble visualizing the time that the balls are actually in the air.
Am i wrong in first trying to figure out when the first ball reaches s=0 (top of tower?) Is there a way that I can do this including the entire journey of the first ball in the equation?
If I use t-1 what exactly does this mean? That the ball is in the air for one second less?

If anyone could help I would be very appreciative. I am self studying physics for an exam, and I have a lot of trouble understanding it, so I really need to see clear steps to follow. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you have a great start. Don't forget the height of the tower.
*edited to correct initial velocity*
Ball 1 has position ##s_1 = 100+15t - 4.9t^2##.
Ball 2 has position ##s_2 = 100-4.9(t-2)^2## for t >2.
Total distance traveled for ball 2 is d= 100-s, where s is where they meet. For ball 1 it is (max height-100)x2 + d.
 
Oh :/ I can't believe I forgot that! Is the equation then actually:
s=s0+v0t+1/2at2 ?

I got t=4.26s and they reach each other at about 75m.

Thank you!
Why does it not work if I do it the first way? If I determine how long it takes for ball one to be thrown up and come back down to the height of the tower and I use appropriate values for t or t-1 shouldn't it also work?
 
Tulpje said:
I then came out to a formula: -4.9t^2=15t-15-4.9t^2+9.8t-4.9
This doesn't look quite right. First, rounding 3.06 seconds to 3 might influence your solution depending on how many significant digits you want to keep. Second, if you are only looking at the downward part of the problem, your initial velocity of the first ball is pointing down.
You should have had ##-15(t-1) - 4.9(t-1)^2 = -4.9 t^2##.
Since you started with the wrong velocity direction, the solution you found was for t<1, or before your first ball returned to the top of the tower.

upload_2015-8-21_10-24-0.png

Graphically, here is what the two position functions should look like, along with an approximate reference point.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-8-21_10-29-2.png
    upload_2015-8-21_10-29-2.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 570
Thank you! It makes sense now
 
Tulpje said:
Thank you! It makes sense now

What about considering the relative motion between the balls?
 
  • Like
Likes RUber
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top