Tilt of Earth's Equator: Arctic, Antarctic, Tropics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mozartkart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Tilt
AI Thread Summary
If Earth's equator tilted at 177.4° like Venus, the latitudes of the Arctic and Antarctic Circles and the Tropics would shift significantly. The Tropics would be located at +/- 177.4°, while the Arctic and Antarctic Circles would be defined by the new tilt, affecting the Sun's position during solstices. To visualize this, one can draw a circle representing Earth and mark the intersections of lines tilted at 177.4° from both the horizontal and vertical. This exercise raises questions about the designation of the North and South Poles and the naming conventions for these latitudes, originally based on Earth's perspective. Understanding these changes helps clarify the implications of such a tilt on solar positions and climate.
mozartkart
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the tilt of Earth’s equator relative to its orbit were 177.4◦ (like Venus) instead of
23.5◦. At what latitudes would the Arctic and Antarctic Circles and the two Tropics be lo-
cated?


Homework Equations



N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



I would like someone to help me make a mental image or reword this for me as this is probably the easiest question on a large astrophysics assignment I have but I am having trouble picturing this and understand how Venus's retrograde motion works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mozartkart said:

Homework Statement



Suppose the tilt of Earth’s equator relative to its orbit were 177.4◦ (like Venus) instead of
23.5◦. At what latitudes would the Arctic and Antarctic Circles and the two Tropics be lo-
cated?


Homework Equations



N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



I would like someone to help me make a mental image or reword this for me as this is probably the easiest question on a large astrophysics assignment I have but I am having trouble picturing this and understand how Venus's retrograde motion works.

The latitudes of these great circles are related to the tilt of the planet.

For example, if the inclination from the vertical is i, then the tropics are at latitudes +/- i. These circles represent the greatest deviation from the equator where the Sun can appear directly overhead; i.e. the circle of greatest altitude of the Sun, occurring on the Solstices.

The arctic and antarctic circles are the limits where the Sun can be above the horizon or below the horizon for an entire day.

Draw a circle representing the Earth and draw lines through the center tilted 23.5° to the horizontal (+ and - 23.5°). Their intersection with the circle represents the limits of the Sun's maximal excursion North and South for being directly overhead; those are the Tropical limits.

Do the same with lines tilted 23.5° from the vertical. These lines intersect the surface at the limits of the arctic circles.

Now draw a new circle and draw lines with tilts of +/- 177.4° . Note the intersections and compare to those for the Earth's circle.

The remaining questions are how do you designate North and South poles to name the arctic versus the antarctic circles, and what will be the naming convention for the Tropical latitudes, which were originally astrologically named from an Earth perspective (in which constellations is the Sun when it reaches the solstices?).
 
gneill said:
The latitudes of these great circles are related to the tilt of the planet.

For example, if the inclination from the vertical is i, then the tropics are at latitudes +/- i. These circles represent the greatest deviation from the equator where the Sun can appear directly overhead; i.e. the circle of greatest altitude of the Sun, occurring on the Solstices.

The arctic and antarctic circles are the limits where the Sun can be above the horizon or below the horizon for an entire day.

Draw a circle representing the Earth and draw lines through the center tilted 23.5° to the horizontal (+ and - 23.5°). Their intersection with the circle represents the limits of the Sun's maximal excursion North and South for being directly overhead; those are the Tropical limits.

Do the same with lines tilted 23.5° from the vertical. These lines intersect the surface at the limits of the arctic circles.

Now draw a new circle and draw lines with tilts of +/- 177.4° . Note the intersections and compare to those for the Earth's circle.

The remaining questions are how do you designate North and South poles to name the arctic versus the antarctic circles, and what will be the naming convention for the Tropical latitudes, which were originally astrologically named from an Earth perspective (in which constellations is the Sun when it reaches the solstices?).

Thank you for your help, this was really easy to picture and made my point of view much clearer. Have a great day/night :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top