Calculating Time Dilation in a Relativistic Spaceship Passage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little PBrane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time dilation experienced by a spaceship traveling between two beacons, positioned 40 million meters apart, at a speed of 0.30c. Observers at the beacons time the passage, leading to confusion about the correct application of relativistic equations. The initial calculation suggests a time of approximately 465 milliseconds, but there is uncertainty regarding the reference frame for the distance measurement. It is proposed that if the distance is measured in the ship's frame, the problem becomes a relativistic one, while if measured in the observers' frame, it simplifies to a basic distance over speed calculation. Clarification on the reference frame is essential for accurate computation.
Little PBrane
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two fixed navigation beacons mark the approach lane to a star. The beacons are in line with the star and are 40 x 106 m apart. A spaceship approaches the star with a relative velocity of 0.30 c and passes the beacons. The passage of the ship between the beacons is timed by observers on the beacons. The time interval of the passage according to observers is closest to:

Homework Equations



The given distance between the star and the beacons=s=40*10^6 m

Velocity of the given spaceship=0.30 c

The passage of the ship between the beacons is timed by observers on the beacons

Δt=Δt0 /√(1 - v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution



=(s/v)/√(1 - v2/c2)=(40*10^6 m/0.30c)√(1 - 0.302)
=0.44/0.954=0.465 seconds=465 ms
I think this is wrong. Answer choices given are:
470, 420, 250, 440, 170
Am I thinking this right? For the observer the time should be larger not smaller. 444ms ((4*10^6)/0.3c) would be the time inside the spaceship, correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the observers reference frame s=vt is always true.
 
The difficulty here is that you (or the problem) did not state in which reference fram the 40x10^{6}m is measured.

As Quinzio suggested you will not have to do any calculations to adjust the velocity of the ship... therefore if the 40x10^{6}m is given in the reference frame of the observers then this isn't even a relativistic problem.. you would just do d/v = t and be done with it..

However, I think it would make more sense if this was a relativistic calculation, so it's probably best if you assume that the distance 40x10^{6}m is actually measured in the reference frame of the ship.

So perhaps that will help you?
usually relativity problems are very good about specifying in what reference frame all measurements are made... but I guess not in this case.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top