Time at a certain reference line

AI Thread Summary
To determine the negative time when the reference line was at θ = -10.5 rad, the equation Θ = θi + ωit + 1/2αt^2 is appropriate, with θi at 0 rad, ωi at 4.7 rad/s, and α at -0.25 rad/s². The confusion arises regarding the final angular position and velocity; however, the initial conditions at t=0 should be used. By substituting these values into the equation, the time can be calculated for when θ reaches -10.5 rad. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining constant acceleration and initial conditions throughout the calculations. Understanding these parameters is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
bearhug
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
At t=0, a flywheel has an angular velocity of 4.7 rad/s, a constant angular acceleration of -0.25 rad/s^2, and a reference line at θ(t=0)=0 rad.
Assuming the motion proceeded similary at times before t=0, at what negative time was the reference line at θ=-10.5 rad?

Based on this question I'm assuming that acceleration is still -0.25 rad/s^2 and angular velocity is still 4.7 rad/s.

Θf = θi + ωit + 1/2αt^2 is the equation I was planning on using to find time. However I'm confused as to what I should consider the final radians and final velocity. Should it be at θ=0 with final velocity at 4.7 rad/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bearhug said:
At t=0, a flywheel has an angular velocity of 4.7 rad/s, a constant angular acceleration of -0.25 rad/s^2, and a reference line at θ(t=0)=0 rad.
Assuming the motion proceeded similary at times before t=0, at what negative time was the reference line at θ=-10.5 rad?

Based on this question I'm assuming that acceleration is still -0.25 rad/s^2 and angular velocity is still 4.7 rad/s.

Θf = θi + ωit + 1/2αt^2 is the equation I was planning on using to find time. However I'm confused as to what I should consider the final radians and final velocity. Should it be at θ=0 with final velocity at 4.7 rad/s?
When you write
Θ = θi + ωit + 1/2αt^2
you are effectively saying that α is a constant and that
ω = ωi + αt
So
θi is the value of Θ when t = 0
ωi is the value of ω when t = 0
Putting those values into
Θ = θi + ωit + 1/2αt^2
allows you to find Θ at any other time (positve or negative)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top