Time Dilation Explained: What About Light Speed?

richardparsons
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Many explanations of time dilation use light sent from mirror to mirror on moving spaceships to explain that since the distance the light travels increases then time must increase in order to keep the speed of light the same . . . however, in order for the light to leave one spaceship and hit the other one, the light must have a horizontal velocity equal to the speed of the spaceship . . . if it has c as its speed toward the other ship and it has a horizontal velocity . . . then, in fact, its speed is greater than c . . which is not allowed. How does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richardparsons said:
Many explanations of time dilation use light sent from mirror to mirror on moving spaceships to explain that since the distance the light travels increases then time must increase in order to keep the speed of light the same
Yes, the standard "light clock" thought experiment.
. . . however, in order for the light to leave one spaceship and hit the other one,
The light just bounces back and forth between two mirrors inside the one spaceship.
the light must have a horizontal velocity equal to the speed of the spaceship . . . if it has c as its speed toward the other ship and it has a horizontal velocity . . . then, in fact, its speed is greater than c . . which is not allowed. How does this work?
When the moving light clock is viewed from another frame it is certainly true that the light pulses must have a horizontal component of velocity equal to that of the spaceship. But from that frame, the light moves at an angle with speed c.

In the moving spaceship's own frame, the light just moves vertically. Also at speed c.
 
Last edited:
Here's an animation I made that might help you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEhvU31YaCw

If you want detailed explanation, see this thread.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top