Time Dilation: Is Distance a Factor?

Moose352
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
Someone told me that the normal time dilation formula \Delta t = \gamma t_{0} is not correct and that the time dilation also depends on the distance (I'm not entirely sure of what). Is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moose352 said:
Someone told me that the normal time dilation formula \Delta t = \gamma t_{0} is not correct and that the time dilation also depends on the distance (I'm not entirely sure of what). Is this true?

He was probably referring to an accelerated frame observer. It is correct for calculating the time dilation of something with respect to an inertial frame.
 
Your friend could also have been referring to the Lorentz transformed time interval in a frame S' for which two events in S do not occur at the same location. In that case:

Δt'=γ(Δt-vΔx/c2)

In that case, the time interval in S' depends on the spatial interval between the events in S. Of course, it would be a misnomer to call that "time dilation".

However, in an inertial frame, for which Δx=0, the formula you state is correct.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
305
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top