Time dilation (special relativity) problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a time dilation problem in special relativity involving a plane traveling between two cities at 0.2c. The proper distance of 500 km is perceived as approximately 489.9 km by the pilot due to length contraction. The confusion arises when calculating time, as the pilot's time should be derived from the contracted distance, resulting in 0.00817 seconds, while using the proper distance leads to an incorrect time of 0.00833 seconds. The key distinction is that proper time is measured between two events occurring at the same position in a given reference frame, which explains the asymmetry in time measurements between the pilot and observers on the ground. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between time and distance in different frames of reference.
palex3
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a pretty classical problem. A plane goes from city A to city B. The distance between the two cities (measured on the ground) is 500 km. The plane is traveling at 0.2c. How long does the trip take for the pilot and what is the distance between the two cities for the pilot?

Homework Equations


I know that
L = L_0/\gamma
and
\Delta T = \gamma \Delta T_0

The Attempt at a Solution


The proper distance is 500 km, so I can work out that the pilot sees a distance of approximately 489.9 km. My problem is with the time. I know that I can divide 489.9 by 0.2c to get the time for the pilot: 0.00817 seconds. This is the correct answer. But why is it wrong for me to divide 500 km by 0.2 c (=0.00833s) and consider that the proper time, after which I transform it by multiplying by gamma (the result is 0.0085018 s)? I noticed that if I consider the time on the ground to be the "moving" time and the time for the pilot to be the proper time, using the formula gives me the correct time. But it doesn't make sense to me, since I started considering the ground as the rest frame. Why the switch? My guess would be that it has something to do with needing two clocks on the ground and one in the air, but I still don't really understand the asymetry.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One common idea for proper time is that it is the time interval between two events in the reference frame at which they both occur at the same position coordinate.

Do you see how this means we can't set 0.00833 to be the proper time? (What are the x coordinates for the two events (plane is at A) and (plane is at B) in the ground reference frame? What are the x coordinates for the two events in the planes reference frame?)
 
palex3 said:
My guess would be that it has something to do with needing two clocks on the ground and one in the air, but I still don't really understand the asymetry.
That's it exactly. The two events in this problem are: (1) Plane passes city A, and (2) Plane passes city B. On the plane, the time between those events is measured on a single clock. To the earth, that plane clock is moving and the "time dilation" formula can be applied. ("Moving clocks run slow.")

On the earth, the times of those events are measured on two different clocks. According to the plane observer, those Earth clocks are not synchronized (clock B is ahead of clock A), so the plane observer disagrees with the Earth observers as to how much time elapsed on Earth clocks during his trip.

But Distance = speed * time always works, as long as you stick to a single frame. :wink:
 
That clears it up, thanks a lot to both of you!
My problem was that I didn't see the difference between proper time (and lenght). Or rather, I didn't see what was special about it. In my head, time was time, no matter where you measure it (as long as it's in the same reference frame). Part of the cause for that missunderstanding is the naming convention in my physics book, part was me not being completely in the ''relativity'' mindset and part was my teacher using youtube videos to try to explain the issue.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
717
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top