Time Evolution of Hydrogen Atom in a Magnetic Field

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A hydrogen atom is prepared in its ground state with spin up along the z-direction.
At time t = 0 a constant magnetic field ##\vec{B}##
(pointing in an arbitrary direction determined
by ##\theta## and ##\phi##) is turned on. Neglecting the fine structure and terms proportional to ##\vec{A}^2##
Compute the probability that the atom will be found in the ground state with spin down as
a function of time.
(i) Solve this problem exactly
(ii) Use first order perturbation theory
(iii) Expand your solution in (i) in Taylor series for short times and compare you result
with the one obtained in (ii).
3

Homework Equations



So to me this seems exactly like the Zeeman effect. So naturally I am using the Hamiltonian from this analysis (with the ##\vec{A}^2## or ##\vec{B}^2## term neglected.)

\hat{H}=\frac{\hat{\vec{p}}^2}{2m_e}+V_C(r)-\frac{e}{2m_e c}B(\hat{L}_z+2\hat{S_z})

Where ##V_C(r)## is the coulomb potential, and is part of the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

The exact solution for the time evolution of a ket of the form..

|\alpha,t_0,t>_I=\sum_n C_n(t)|n>

is found by finding the expansion coefficients ##C_n(t)## using..

i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}C_n(t)=\sum_m e^{i(E_n-E_m)/\hbar}V_{nm}(t)C_m(t)

And the approximate form is found by the Dyson series, with first order being equal to..
C_n^1=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{t_0}^{t} e^{i(E_n-E_i)\\hbar}V_{ni}(t')dt'

The Attempt at a Solution



There is one major hurdle that is stopping me from making any progress on this problem, and that is the fact that if I write the perturbation term in its matrix form, from the Zeeman effect, the elements are equal to..

-\frac{e\hbar Bm}{2m_e c}\left[ 1 \pm \frac{1}{(2l+1)} \right]

Where this matrix is diagonal in the |n,l,j,m> basis. Thus, when I apply the third equation (the exact solution for the expansion coefficients) from section 2 above, I get uncoupled equations for the expansion coefficients, meaning a diagonal matrix, meaning, when I try to find any transition probabilities, I get zero from orthogonality!

I have realized that this comes from the fact that my hamiltonian is no different than the Zeeman effect and goes not depend on time. I feel like this has to be my source of error.

Where am I going wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay so I realized that the magnetic field is not only in the Z direction as the Zeeman effect was. So now I redid the problem and got this as the perturbation.

-\frac{eB}{2m_e c}\left[ \hat{L}_y-\hat{L}_x-\hat{L}_z-2\hat{S}_z \right]

I am still having problems because he doesn't specify what n has to be. I am assuming the electron is bound and can only go from spin up to spin down, making this a two state problem. Is this assumption wrong? Because I still get a diagonal matrix even with the above Hamiltonian. I can scan my work if anyone needs to see it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top