Time Evolution of the Complex Scalar Field

Xenosum
Messages
18
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider the Lagrangian, L, given by

L = \partial_{\mu}\phi^{*}(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi(x) - m^2\phi^{*}(x)\phi(x) .

The conjugate momenta to \phi(x) and \phi^{*}(x) are denoted, respectively, by \pi(x) and \pi^{*}(x). Thus,

\pi(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi(x))} = \partial_0\phi^{*}(x)
\pi^{*}(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi^{*}(x))} = \partial_0\phi(x) .

Upon quantizing the system, \phi(x) and \phi^{*}(x) are promoted to operators which satisfy the equal-time commutation relations:

[ \phi(x) , \pi(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})
[ \phi^{*}(x) , \pi^{*}(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})

(all others zero). In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator \phi(x), i \partial_0 \phi(x), is given by

i \partial_0 \phi(x) = \left[ \phi(x) , H(y) \right].

The Hamiltonian may be derived from the Lagrangian, and we find that

i\frac{\partial \phi(x)}{\partial t} = \int d^{3}y \left( \left[ \phi(x) , \pi(y)\pi^{*}(y) \right] + \left[ \phi(x) , \nabla\phi^{*}(y) \cdot \nabla\phi(y) \right] + m^2 \left[ \phi(x) , \phi^{*}(y)\phi(y) \right] \right).

Now here's my question. When we evaluate the commutators both my professor and a solution manual to Peskin and Schroeder claim that only the first commutator survives, because \phi(x) commutes with everything except for the its conjugate momentum (by the canonical commutation relations). I don't see why. The canonical commutation relations only give us a relationship between \phi(x) and \pi(y), not e.g. \phi(x) and \phi(y). The point is pressed by the fact that one can only show that the commutator \left[ \phi(x) , \phi(y) \right] vanishes for space-like separation between the points x and y (this is the condition which preserves causality).

I guess it would be resolved if the commutator were instead \left[ \phi(x) , H(x) \right], but this doesn't seem to be how it's done.

Thanks for any help!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xenosum said:
In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator ϕ(x) \phi(x) , i∂0ϕ(x) i \partial_0 \phi(x) , is given by

i∂0ϕ(x)=[ϕ(x),H(y)].​

The Hamiltonian really should be the Hamiltonian at time ##x^0 = y^0## (note that you are integrating over the spatial components of ##y##). As a result, ##x## and ##y## have space-like separation and the commutator ##[\phi(x),\phi(y)]## vanishes (they are even equal-time).
 
  • Like
Likes Xenosum
Cool, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top