Time Interval for measuring Rate of Reaction

AI Thread Summary
Using long time intervals, such as one minute, for measuring the rate of reaction can lead to significant errors in concentration data. Reactions typically do not progress linearly over time; they slow down as they approach completion or equilibrium. This means that the difference between successive concentration measurements may become negligible compared to the error in those measurements. Additionally, longer intervals reduce the number of data points collected, which can result in missing critical changes in reaction progress, especially if the reaction is rapid. Accurate rate measurements require more frequent sampling to capture the dynamics of the reaction effectively.
rpullo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
So we did a dry lab in class, and we were determining sources of error for a particular lab dealing with the measurement of rate of reaction. My teacher said that the time intervals of the recorded concentration was too far apart (1 minute intervals).
I was wondering if anyone would explain why this is a source of error? My teacher never said anything about it.
Thanks
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Concentrations will not vary in a linear manner over time. Reactions will slow down as they approach completion (or equilibrium). Eventually the error in your concentration measurements will be greater than the difference between successive measurements.

The more time you wait between measurements, the fewer measurements you can make before this happens.
 
To reword PhaseShifter comment - if the reaction is too fast, you don't have enough data points. In the border case if the reaction is fast enough, it ends before your first measurement.

--
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top