Time period and natural frequency

AI Thread Summary
Natural frequency and time period terminology primarily apply to simple harmonic motions (SHM) and their fundamental modes. While these terms can extend to other periodic motions, the distinction lies in the reasons behind the specific frequencies or periods being considered "natural." For instance, the natural frequency of a simple harmonic oscillator is defined by the spring constant and mass ratio, while a vibrating string's fundamental frequency depends on its density, spring constant, and length. In contrast, the Earth's rotation is periodic but lacks a compelling reason for its specific frequency of one cycle per day. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurately discussing periodic motions and their characteristics.
svishal03
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
A fundamnetal question here;

IS it that the terminologies natural time period and frequency are used only for simple harmonic motions and not for motions which are periodic/sinusoidal like an SHM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
svishal03 said:
A fundamnetal question here;

IS it that the terminologies natural time period and frequency are used only for simple harmonic motions and not for motions which are periodic/sinusoidal like an SHM?
Usually, natural frequency refers to the frequency of the fundamental mode.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/reson.html#c3
 
And when we say fundamental mode, it is always simple harmonic, right?

Am I right natural frequency and time period can be used for motions which have a periodicity?
 
Not just a periodicity but some clear reason why that frequency or period is more natural than any other. For example, the simple harmonic oscillator has a natural frequency which is determined by the ratio of spring constant to mass. Similarly a vibrating string has a fundamental frequency determined by the density, spring constant, and length.

The rotating Earth on the other hand is more or less periodic but there is no overwhelming reason why it wants to rotate at 1 cycle/day as opposed to any other frequency.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top