Time taken for energy to drop 95% in damped SHO

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for the energy of a damped simple harmonic oscillator to drop to 5% of its initial value. The user has successfully determined the frequency of oscillation as 7 Hz and the percentage drop in amplitude per cycle as 2%. However, their calculated time of 21.2 seconds for the energy drop conflicts with the solution provided in the textbook. The conversation also touches on the correct units for the damping coefficient, clarifying that it should be in Ns/m. Overall, the user seeks validation for their calculations and understanding of the damping effect on energy loss.
Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
There is a post about the same problem here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/damped-oscilating-spring.12838/

It was helpful for solving part B.

1. Homework Statement


A 10.6kg object oscillates at the end of a vertical spring that has a spring constant of 2.05x10^4 N/m. The effect of air resistance is represented by the damping coefficient b = 3.00Ns/m.

(a) Calculate the frequency of the damped oscillation.

(b) By what percentage does the amplitude of the oscillation decrease in each cycle?

(c) Find the time interval that elapses while the energy of the system drops to 5.00% of it's initial value.

Homework Equations



1. x = Ae^(bt/2m) cos(wt + phi)

2. (From post mentioned above): %Difference = 1 - e^(bt/2m) * 100%

The Attempt at a Solution



I have completed part (A): frequency is 7Hz and (B): Percent drop is 2%.

For part (C) I tried solving the second equation above for t, then subbing in difference of 0.95.

I end up with t = -(2m/b) ln(1-D)

solving when D = 0.95 gives me:

t = 21.2s

This is exactly double the solution in the back. Why is it not the same? I didn't insert a factor of two anywhere, the two in the equation is meant to be there.

Is the back wrong? Or am I making a stupid mistake somewhere? It's more likely that I've made a mistake but I've been looking at it awhile now and I'm stumped.

---

I also tried multiplying the time taken to drop 2% (The period, sqrt(k/m) ) by 47.5 but then I end up with:

t = 6.97s

I realized after this would not work because the decrease in energy is not linear, hence the exponential term in the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Phynos, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Looking at your method I can't find fault. t = 21.2s seems like a correct value to me. Of course, I stand ready to be corrected by someone more clever than I :smile:

I do have one nit to pick, and that's with the units of the given damping coefficient. I think they should be Ns/m rather than Nm/s. Usually the air resistance force is modeled as being proportional to velocity in this type of problem, so b*V should yield Newtons.
 
Thanks.

[Ns/m][m/s] = N

The units are in Ns/m in my post. Perhaps you misread, unless you meant they should not be? But I think they are correct.
 
Phynos said:
Thanks.

[Ns/m][m/s] = N

The units are in Ns/m in my post. Perhaps you misread, unless you meant they should not be? But I think they are correct.
Ah. My apologies. I think I must have been confused by Klion's post (which you linked to).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top