Time to Rotate Metal Sphere 1 Time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the rotation of a large stone sphere pushed by a girl with a force of 45N. Key calculations include determining the torque, angular acceleration, and the time required for the sphere to complete one full rotation. The initial calculations led to an incorrect conclusion due to a misunderstanding of the relationship between the angle of rotation and the radius. The correct angle for one full rotation is always 2π radians, independent of the radius. The final calculation for the time taken to rotate the sphere one full turn is confirmed to be 27.24 seconds.
atomB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A girl pushes on a large stone sphere. The sphere has a mass of 8200 kg and a radius of 90 cm and floats with nearly zero friction on a thin layer of pressurized water.

Suppose that she pushes on the sphere tangent to its surface with a steady force of F = 45N and that the pressured water provides a frictionless support. How long will it take her to rotate the sphere one time, starting from rest?

m = 8200kg
r = 90cm = 0.90m
Fapplied = 45N

Homework Equations



τ = RF_perpendicular
α = τ/I
I = 2/5MR2
θ = ω0t + 1/2αt2
θ = 2∏r

The Attempt at a Solution



Solve for τ = (45N)(0.90m) = 40.5 N*m
Solve for α = 40.5N*m/[2/5(8200kg)(0.90m)2] = 0.01524 rad/s2
Solve for θ = 2∏(0.90m) = 5.65486 rad

Solve for t: 5.65486 rad = 0 + 1/2(0.01524 rad/s2)(t2)
t = 27.24 s

The answer isn't right when I submitted it; I thought my process was correct. Where did I go wrong here?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
atomB said:
Solve for θ = 2∏(0.90m) = 5.65486 rad

The angle θ does not depend on the radius. A full turn is always 2pi radians.
 
You're absolutely right; for some reason, I was thinking circumference. Thanks for catching that!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top