[tips for doing static equilibrium questions]

AI Thread Summary
Static equilibrium questions require understanding that the sum of all forces and torques must equal zero. A key strategy is to draw free body diagrams to visualize forces and break them into their x and y components. Practicing various problem types enhances familiarity, especially with complex scenarios like ladders. It’s important to recognize that certain forces, such as those from walls, may not provide upward support, necessitating careful analysis of ground forces. Mastery of these concepts will improve problem-solving skills in static equilibrium situations.
F|234K
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
i have found that static equilibrium questions (which require the sum of all forces and torques to be zero) are the most challenging to me.

i don't know why, maybe there are a lot of different type of static equilibrium questions (they always ask the same questions but with different situations...).

hence, i would really appreciate it if you guys will tell me some of ur "strategies" when it comes to doing these questions, or some cautious things people need to pay close attention to when doing them, or just some mental notes you made to yourself when you were trying to learn how to do them.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it has more then likely been told to you before but I will say it again, draw a freed body diagram. Draw arrows where the forces are. Then break these force arrows up into their x and y directions. Practice is also important as in anything else. Some things will not be obvious on first glance, but will seem so on your third or fourth time on the same type of problem.
 
thanks.

ok, but then sometimes, there are those weird situations (like ladders) which are hard to analyse.
 
<br /> \begin{picture}(100,100)(0,0)<br /> <br /> \put(0,0){\line(1,0){100}}<br /> \put(0,0){\line(0,1){100}}<br /> \put(0,75){\line(1,-1){75}}<br /> \put(40,5){{\bf b}}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

b is the angle between the ladder and the ground. If a weight is place on the ladder like so:
<br /> \begin{picture}(100,100)(0,0)<br /> <br /> \put(0,0){\line(1,0){100}}<br /> \put(0,0){\line(0,1){100}}<br /> \put(0,75){\line(1,-1){75}}<br /> \put(37.5,37.5){\circle{5}}<br /> <br /> \put(37.5,37.5){\line(0,-1){20}}<br /> \put(37.5,17.5){\line(1,1){10}}<br /> \put(37.5,17.5){\line(-1,1){10}}<br /> \put(07.5,17.5){{\bf Fa}}<br /> <br /> \put(40,5){{\bf b}}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

The wall can not provide any upward force so the upward force must be provided by the part of the ladder touching the ground so:?

<br /> \begin{picture}(100,100)(0,0)<br /> <br /> \put(0,0){\line(1,0){100}}<br /> \put(0,0){\line(0,1){100}}<br /> \put(0,75){\line(1,-1){75}}<br /> \put(37.5,37.5){\circle{5}}<br /> <br /> \put(37.5,37.5){\line(0,-1){20}}<br /> \put(37.5,17.5){\line(1,1){10}}<br /> \put(37.5,17.5){\line(-1,1){10}}<br /> \put(07.5,17.5){{\bf Fa}}<br /> <br /> \put(75.5,0){\line(0,11){20}}<br /> \put(75,20){\line(-1,-1){10}}<br /> \put(75,20){\line(1,-1){10}}<br /> \put(95,20){{\bf Fb}}<br /> <br /> \put(40,5){{\bf b}}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

Fa therefore must equal Fb


Now to find the force on the wall.

<br /> \begin{picture}(100,100)(50,0)<br /> <br /> \put(50,0){\line(1,0){100}}<br /> \put(50,0){\line(0,1){100}}<br /> \put(50,75){\line(1,-1){75}}<br /> \put(87.5,37.5){\circle{5}}<br /> <br /> \put(87.5,37.5){\line(0,-1){20}}<br /> \put(87.5,17.5){\line(1,1){10}}<br /> \put(87.5,17.5){\line(-1,1){10}}<br /> \put(57.5,17.5){{\bf Fa}}<br /> <br /> \put(125.5,0){\line(0,1){20}}<br /> \put(125,20){\line(-1,-1){10}}<br /> \put(125,20){\line(1,-1){10}}<br /> \put(145,20){{\bf Fb}}<br /> <br /> \put(50,75){\line(-1,0){20}}<br /> \put(30,75){\line(1,1){10}}<br /> \put(30,75){\line(1,-1){10}}<br /> \put(30,55){{\bf Fc}}<br /> <br /> <br /> \put(90,5){{\bf b}}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

The angle between the ladder and the force Fb is 90-b.
Now we can use the triangle made by Fb and Fc
Fb Tan(90-b) = Fa
 
ok. thanks a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top