Titanium Nozzle Durability: How Does it Withstand Extreme Temperatures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter donaldcat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nozzle
AI Thread Summary
Titanium nozzles withstand extreme temperatures due to the cooling effect of gas flow, which prevents them from reaching their melting point of 1668 degrees Celsius, despite flames reaching 3200-3500 degrees Celsius. The discussion highlights that materials like brass are used in acetylene torches, which can cut through steel, indicating that nozzle materials must be carefully selected based on their thermal properties. Concerns are raised about using titanium for nozzles, as it ignites at lower temperatures and burns fiercely in air, making it a questionable choice. The effectiveness of nozzle materials in high-temperature applications is critical for safety and performance. Overall, the choice of nozzle material is essential to ensure durability and functionality in extreme conditions.
donaldcat
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Why does the nozzle not melt even when the melting point of titanium at 1668 degree Celcius, and the flame of the flame is up to 3200-3500 degree Celcius.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that what is burning coming out of the nozzle is gaseous, the flow of the gas through the nozzle will cool it. (The cooling effect would work with liquid too)

Acetylene torches for example, IIRC, have brass nozzles (with several small holes for the oxygen and acetylene to emerge) and can cut through steel, a much higher melting point material. Oxy-hydrogen torches can cut through reinforced concrete, and concrete is VERY refractory.
 
What type of nozzles do you think are made from titanium? Considering it catches fire at a lower temperature than it melts and burns fiercely in air (similar to magnesium, if you have seen that demonstrated in a chemistry lab) that would be a very dumb idea.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top