How does gas behave/flow in different sized tubing/piping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryder S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas
AI Thread Summary
Gas flow through tubing is influenced by diameter changes, where transitioning from a larger to a smaller diameter results in increased velocity and decreased pressure, while the opposite transition leads to decreased velocity and potential pressure recovery. The mass flow rate remains constant, meaning that if 1 kg of air enters the pipe per second, it must also exit at that rate, affecting velocity based on the cross-sectional area. The Bernoulli equation illustrates the relationship between pressure, velocity, and energy conservation, indicating that increased pipe area leads to decreased velocity and increased pressure. However, factors like wall friction and rapid changes in pipe diameter can disrupt this ideal flow, causing energy loss and flow separation. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing gas behavior in different piping scenarios.
Ryder S
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I understand that gas flow through a circular tube or pipe will have some understandable effects... for example the pressure drops, and the maximum flow diminishes. I also know that turbulence and the tubing surface has an effect...

Without getting too specific, I just want to understand generally what happens with gas flowing from a larger diameter tube to a lower diameter tube... and not having to factor in turbulence and such... just assuming a smooth flow.

Actually, I'd like to understand flow the other way too... from a small diameter to a larger one. I suppose flow will still go down... but does pressure recover?

What is the numeric relation of things like pressure and flow to changes in diameter?

My intuition suggests that any change to a smaller diameter might be thought of as an orifice of sorts, and that nothing downstream can tell what's happening in the upstream pipe provided that the pressure is the same.

I'd love to see an interactive simulator... it would help me visualize.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What goes in must come out...
If you put 1 kg of air into the pipe every second, then 1 kg of air has to come out of the pipe. This is true at every location in the pipe, so at every location in the pipe 1 kg of air will flow through every second. So if the pipe area gets larger, the velocity drops. This is because air density times pipe area times velocity gives you the mass flow rate: m=\rho \cdot A\cdot V=\textrm{constant}. If the pipe area gets smaller, the velocity increases.

What goes in must come out also holds for energy. The kinetic (motion) energy is \frac{1}{2}\cdot\rho\cdot V^2. The kinetic energy plus the pressure that go into the pipe should also come out of the pipe: p+\frac{1}{2}\rho V^2=\textrm{constant}. This is the Bernoulli equation. It says (together with the conservation of mass equation) that if your pipe area increases, your velocity decreases and that means that your pressure increases to keep the energy constant.
There are two things I will mention that mess this perfect world up. The first is wall friction. Part of the energy is used to overcome the wall friction and the total energy contained in the air decreases.
The second is that if your pipe area increases too fast, the flow cannot keep up with the pipe walls anymore and you will get flow separation and recirculation zones. This will also use energy.

I hope this helps. Read a bit about the Bernoulli equation to understand its range of applicability.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top