Why Cannot I Factorize the Partition Function?

Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hi everibody, the other day in a stadistical physics lesson we were studyng Fermi Dirac and Bose Einstein stadistics and comparing it to the classical Maxwell Boltzmann's.

We learned that in the quantum stadistics for indistinguishable particles the partition function of the whole system couldn't be written as the multiplication of the partition function of all the single particles of the system as we used to do when we were working in the classical limit.

So, can please anybody tell me if there is a physical reason why I can't write the partition formulal for Bose Einstein's and Fermi Dirac's stadistic as ∏(zn)?

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavefunction has to be symmetric under exchange of two identical bosons, and antisymmetric under exchange of two identical fermions - otherwise you cannot reproduce the observed statistics. With a factorized partition function this does not work.
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
Thank you very much for your anwser.
By the way, can you point me to a book where whis is treated?
 
Last edited:
This should be covered in every book about quantum mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
However, while it is not possible to factorize the canonical partition function, it is possible to factorize the grand canonical partition function.
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top